Measurement and Preparation in the Double Slit Experiment

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the distinction between measurement and preparation in the context of the double slit experiment. Participants explore theoretical implications, definitions, and the roles of different apparatuses in quantum mechanics, focusing on how states are prepared and measured.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that preparation involves creating a source that produces an ensemble of quantum systems without measurement, while measurement involves reading values from a device that may alter the state of the system.
  • Others argue that a filter can transform a source into another state, with distinctions made between unitary and dissipative filters, where the latter leaves a measurable trace in the environment.
  • A participant questions how a screen with slits can measure a prepared state, suggesting that the distance between slits does not constitute a measurement of a state.
  • Some participants assert that the setup of the experiment can be designed to reproduce characteristics of the initial preparation device, leading to discussions about the nature of measurement apparatuses.
  • There are claims that multiple measurements can be used to determine the state of a quantum system, with references to the density matrix and its degrees of freedom.
  • One participant emphasizes that measurement devices in quantum mechanics are treated differently from classical devices, suggesting that once a measurement device is considered a quantum system, it loses its status as a measurement device.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of measurement versus preparation, with no consensus reached on the nature of measurement apparatuses or the certainty of results in quantum mechanics.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their discussions, such as the dependence on specific experimental setups and the challenges of idealized conditions in quantum mechanics.

  • #31
vanhees71 said:
Ok, that's still a superposition of states, not of "position".
And of spin states, not of position states!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
It has nothing to do with spin!
|u> is for the upper slit.
 
  • #33
naima said:
It has nothing to do with spin!
|u> is for the upper slit.
Then your notation |u> and |d> stands for two spherical waves, not for two position eigenstates! And nothing at all is measured at the slits (if not energy), just prepared. There are no clicks anywhere. (Except perhaps in a detector later, which does a measurement (of the energy at the detector surface).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
623
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
4K