Measurement of Momentum in Neutron Interferometer

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the measurement of momentum in a neutron interferometer, specifically a Mach-Zehnder setup. The initial state of the neutrons is defined as an eigenfunction of momentum with eigenvalue p = ℏk. The probability of measuring a neutron with negative momentum at the detector location is given by P(-ℏk) = |b|², where the output state after the second beamsplitter is expressed as |ψ⟩ = cos(ϕ)|+k⟩ + sin(ϕ)|-k⟩. The confusion arises from the expectation that only neutrons with positive momentum reach the top detector, despite the interference effects at the second beamsplitter.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave functions and eigenstates.
  • Familiarity with neutron interferometry and the Mach-Zehnder configuration.
  • Knowledge of matrix transformations as applied to quantum states, specifically beamsplitter operations.
  • Basic grasp of probability amplitudes in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of neutron interferometry, focusing on the role of phase shifts in interference patterns.
  • Explore the implications of position uncertainty in quantum mechanics and its effect on measurement outcomes.
  • Investigate the differences between photon and neutron interferometry, particularly regarding momentum and spin correlations.
  • Review quantum state transformations and their applications in experimental setups, including beamsplitter matrices.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those interested in experimental physics, neutron scattering, and interferometry techniques.

Normandy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/62834965/neutron_interferometer.png

Consider a neutron interferometer (NI), such as the Mach-Zehnder interferometer in the figure.

We send in a beam of neutrons. We assume that the flux of neutrons is so low (neutrons can be very slow) so that only one neutron is present at any time inside the interferometer. The neutrons are initially in an eigenfunction of the momentum with eigenvalue p = \hbar k, \left|\psi\right> = \left|+k\right>. The first beamsplitter divides the neutron flux into two parts, that will go into the upper arm or the lower arm with positive or negative momentum. The lower and upper beams are then reflected at the mirrors and recombined at the second beam splitter, after which the neutron flux is measured at one arm. We assume that both beamsplitters work in the same way, delivering an equal flux to each arm (that is, the transmission and reflection are the same).

What is the probability of measuring a neutron with a negative momentum at the location marked 4 in the interferometer?

Homework Equations


If \left|\psi\right> = a\left|+k\right> + b\left|-k\right>, then P(-\hbar k) = \left|b\right|^2

The beamsplitter transforms the states by the matrix
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}<br /> \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; -1 \end{array} \right)<br />
According to our lecture notes the output at the end of the detector will be \left|\psi\right&gt; = \cos(\varphi)\left|+k\right&gt; + \sin(\varphi)\left|-k\right&gt; (this is a bit sketchy since it depends on

The Attempt at a Solution


I answered 0, since the detector is placed only at the top beam, but the solutions state that the answer is \sin(\varphi)^2. However, this confused me since only neutrons with positive momentum would be able to reach the top detector, even though the positive and negative beams interfere at the second beamsplitter. This differs from the photon spin interferometer experiment since photon spin isn't correlated with the photon beam momentum.

I consulted with my TA but he wasn't able to produce a satisfactory explanation (this is a nuclear engineering class so quantum physics isn't the main focus of the class). I came up with a number of possible scenarios and I was wondering which was the correct resolution to this problem:
  • The solutions are correct with no fine print
  • The solutions are incorrect and the probability of measuring negative momentum is 0
  • The solutions are correct for true momentum eigenstates, since the position uncertainty is infinite and so the location of the detector does not matter, but the solutions are incorrect for "real" states since the position uncertainty is finite and so, far enough away from the second beamsplitter, the beam will split back into a beam of positive momentum neutrons and a beam of negative momentum neutrons.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If your initial neutrons all have +k, where is the point in the lower arm of the interferometer?

The given answer suggests regular interference with a variable phase shift ##2\varphi##. I guess between 2 and 3 there is something to introduce a phase shift ##2\varphi##?

Normandy said:
However, this confused me since only neutrons with positive momentum would be able to reach the top detector, even though the positive and negative beams interfere at the second beamsplitter.
Why?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K