Measurements with the CsI(Tl) detector

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on optimizing measurements taken with a CsI(Tl) detector, specifically for cobalt at a distance of 5 cm. Users recommend reducing the conversion gain and adjusting the pulse height gain to enhance peak detection, suggesting a configuration of 512 channels at approximately 2 keV per channel. Binning 8 consecutive channels is advised to improve peak visibility, particularly for the peaks at 1173 keV and 1332 keV. The discussion also emphasizes using fitting techniques to model the counting rate with Gaussian peaks against a quadratic background.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of CsI(Tl) detector operation
  • Knowledge of pulse height gain adjustment
  • Familiarity with Gaussian fitting techniques
  • Experience with spectral analysis and binning methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to configure pulse height gain on CsI(Tl) detectors
  • Learn about Gaussian fitting methods for spectral data analysis
  • Explore software tools for automated peak fitting and analysis
  • Investigate advanced binning techniques to enhance spectral resolution
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and technicians working with radiation detection, particularly those using CsI(Tl) detectors for gamma spectroscopy and spectral analysis.

gxa
Messages
24
Reaction score
3
I made an experiment in the lab. I took some measurements with the CsI(Tl) detector by placing the cobalt at a distance of 5 cm. I have attached the measurement result. I need to find the count for the peak energies. How can I do it? Any idea?
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
You did not use the spectrometer efficiently. The counts are too spread out. You should reduce the conversion gain i.e., use fewer channels for the spectrum, and adust the pulse height gain to put the highest energy peak near the highest channel.

512 channels should be enough about 2keV per channel. If the resolution (Full Width at Half Mac) is 8% for example that would encompass about 40 channels.

With the spectra you have, you could bin (combine) about 8 consecutive channels to make your peaks stand out more. This would be like using only 512 channels.
 
Thank you for your answer, the detector I use is a usb detector and I can only change these settings (I am sending it in the attachment)
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    29.6 KB · Views: 190
Hello again,

1637171335020.png


You haven't been counting very long, have you ?
There is some similarity with e.g. the plot here
Co60.jpg


I hope your 'peaks' are only the ones at 1173 and 1332 keV ? The others are hard to distinguish and that means fitting will be hard too.

The general recipe is:
Form an expression for the assumed counting rate N(x) in a certain energy range, e.g. for two gaussian peaks on a quadratic background:$$N = ax^2 + bx + c \quad
+ C_1 \exp\left (- {(E_1-x)^2\over 2 \sigma_1^2}\right ) \quad +
C_2 \exp\left (- {(E_2-x)^2\over 2 \sigma_2^2}\right ) $$ and minimize ##\sum \Bigl (n_{observed}(x) - N_{expected}(x)\Bigr )^2## by varying the fit parameters ##(a,b,c,C_1, E_1,\sigma_1,C_2, E_2,\sigma_2)##

Figure below shows a half-hearted attempt with C1 =560, C2 = 480

1637174908267.png


but my hunch is you have software tools at your disposal that do this a whole lot better ...

And the binning together as @gleem proposes reduces the noise considerably

##\ ##
 
I'm only counting for 1 minute, thanks for your answers
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K