Measurements with the CsI(Tl) detector

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of a CsI(Tl) detector for measuring gamma-ray energies, specifically focusing on how to analyze the measurement results to identify peak counts. The scope includes experimental techniques and data analysis methods.

Discussion Character

  • Experimental/applied
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their experiment with the CsI(Tl) detector and seeks advice on determining peak counts from their measurements.
  • Another participant critiques the measurement technique, suggesting that the spectrometer settings were not optimized and recommends reducing the conversion gain and adjusting the pulse height gain.
  • A different participant notes the difficulty in distinguishing peaks and suggests a fitting approach using a mathematical model involving Gaussian peaks and a quadratic background.
  • One participant mentions the short counting time of one minute, which may affect the quality of the data collected.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of the measurement technique and the analysis methods. There is no consensus on the best approach to identify peak counts, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal settings and analysis techniques.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential issues with the resolution of the detector, the short counting time, and the specific settings available on the USB detector, which may restrict the analysis options.

gxa
Messages
24
Reaction score
3
I made an experiment in the lab. I took some measurements with the CsI(Tl) detector by placing the cobalt at a distance of 5 cm. I have attached the measurement result. I need to find the count for the peak energies. How can I do it? Any idea?
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
You did not use the spectrometer efficiently. The counts are too spread out. You should reduce the conversion gain i.e., use fewer channels for the spectrum, and adust the pulse height gain to put the highest energy peak near the highest channel.

512 channels should be enough about 2keV per channel. If the resolution (Full Width at Half Mac) is 8% for example that would encompass about 40 channels.

With the spectra you have, you could bin (combine) about 8 consecutive channels to make your peaks stand out more. This would be like using only 512 channels.
 
Thank you for your answer, the detector I use is a usb detector and I can only change these settings (I am sending it in the attachment)
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    29.6 KB · Views: 191
Hello again,

1637171335020.png


You haven't been counting very long, have you ?
There is some similarity with e.g. the plot here
Co60.jpg


I hope your 'peaks' are only the ones at 1173 and 1332 keV ? The others are hard to distinguish and that means fitting will be hard too.

The general recipe is:
Form an expression for the assumed counting rate N(x) in a certain energy range, e.g. for two gaussian peaks on a quadratic background:$$N = ax^2 + bx + c \quad
+ C_1 \exp\left (- {(E_1-x)^2\over 2 \sigma_1^2}\right ) \quad +
C_2 \exp\left (- {(E_2-x)^2\over 2 \sigma_2^2}\right ) $$ and minimize ##\sum \Bigl (n_{observed}(x) - N_{expected}(x)\Bigr )^2## by varying the fit parameters ##(a,b,c,C_1, E_1,\sigma_1,C_2, E_2,\sigma_2)##

Figure below shows a half-hearted attempt with C1 =560, C2 = 480

1637174908267.png


but my hunch is you have software tools at your disposal that do this a whole lot better ...

And the binning together as @gleem proposes reduces the noise considerably

##\ ##
 
I'm only counting for 1 minute, thanks for your answers
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K