Measuring Inertial Mass: Force, Acceleration and Mass

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods used to measure inertial mass, particularly focusing on the relationship between force, acceleration, and mass as described by Newton's second law (F=ma). Participants explore both direct and indirect measurement techniques, as well as the implications of these methods on the concept of mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that inertial mass can be measured using F=ma, questioning how force is measured if it is dependent on mass.
  • Another participant describes the traditional method of measuring mass by comparing it to a known standard mass, mentioning the platinum-iridium standard in Paris.
  • A different participant raises a concern about the circularity of using balances or springs, which rely on forces that are themselves dependent on mass.
  • One participant emphasizes that mass is defined as a standard measurement, referencing the kilogram standard in Paris.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the measurement of mass, particularly regarding the reliance on force and the potential circular reasoning involved. There is no consensus on the implications of these measurement methods.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential limitations in understanding the measurement process, including the dependence on definitions and the circular nature of using force in mass measurement.

Swapnil
Messages
459
Reaction score
6
I was wondering, how is it that scientists measure inertial mass. I presume they use F=ma, and thus the mass of an object would be measured by applying a force on an object and finding out the resulting acceleration. Getting acceleration is simple, but how can they measure the force? Then if they can't measure the force, then how can they measure the mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Normally one measures the mass of an object by comparing it with a known standard mass, either directly using a balance, or indirectly by using a device (like a spring) that is calibrated using known masses.

One finds the mass of the "known" mass by comparing it with yet another standard mass, etc. The end of the chain is a chunk of platinum-iridium alloy stored under controlled conditions in a basement in Paris, whose mass is by definition exactly one kilogram.
 
jtbell said:
Normally one measures the mass of an object by comparing it with a known standard mass, either directly using a balance, or indirectly by using a device (like a spring) that is calibrated using known masses.
But doesn't a balance or a spring use the concept of forces to give you the measured mass? And forces are actually dependent on mass... I don't know why, but doesn't all of this seem to be circular?
 
Swapnil said:
But doesn't a balance or a spring use the concept of forces to give you the measured mass?

The only requirement is that two objects with the same mass be affected equally by equal forces.
 
mass is a si measurement therefore you can think of it as the beginning...like jtbell said it is defined in paris by a piece of metal which is defined to be 1Kg
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 114 ·
4
Replies
114
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 117 ·
4
Replies
117
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
894