Measuring Light Frequency: Does Newton's Law Apply?

Click For Summary
Traveling towards a light source at a constant speed results in a higher measured frequency than the rest frequency, while moving away leads to a lower measured frequency. This phenomenon aligns with the classical Doppler effect, which states that frequency changes based on the relative motion between the observer and the source. However, the relativistic Doppler effect introduces additional corrections that must be considered at high speeds. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding both classical and relativistic effects in measuring light frequency. Overall, the principles of frequency measurement in relation to motion are confirmed.
grounded
Messages
85
Reaction score
1
Can anyone tell me if the following is correct?

Traveling directly towards a source of light at some constant speed, we will measure its frequency to be higher (compared to rest frequency) than what we would expect when using Newton’s laws. Just as traveling away from the source, we would measure its frequency to be a little lower than we would expect it to be.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
grounded said:
Can anyone tell me if the following is correct?

Traveling directly towards a source of light at some constant speed, we will measure its frequency to be higher (compared to rest frequency) than what we would expect when using Newton’s laws. Just as traveling away from the source, we would measure its frequency to be a little lower than we would expect it to be.
Google for "Doppler effect" and "relativistic doppler effect".

The classical Doppler effect says that if you and the light source are moving towards one another (don't think of this as one of them at rest and the other moving) you will measure a higher frequency, and if you and the light source are moving apart you will measure a lower frequency.

Relativity adds an additional correction, the relativistic doppler effect.
 
That's what I thought, just wanted to make sure. Thank you...
 
I've been thinking some more about the Hawking - Penrose Singularity theorem and was wondering if you could help me gain a better understanding of the assumptions they made when they wrote it, in 1970. In Hawking's book, A Brief History of Time (chapter 3, page 25) he writes.... In 1965 I read about Penrose’s theorem that any body undergoing gravitational collapse must eventually form a singularity. I soon realized that if one reversed the direction of time in Penrose’s theorem, so that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K