Measuring LVDS Signal - Single Ended Probes & Oscilloscope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mariam.f
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measuring Signal
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around measuring a Low-Voltage Differential Signaling (LVDS) signal using an oscilloscope, specifically addressing the use of single-ended probes versus differential probes. Participants explore various methods and considerations for effectively capturing the signal from a board that outputs LVDS.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the feasibility of using single-ended probes to measure LVDS signals and expresses difficulty in detecting the signal.
  • Another participant suggests that understanding the voltage, current, and frequency of the LVDS signal is crucial for effective measurement and recommends consulting the sensor's manufacturer for guidance.
  • A link to an application note is provided, potentially offering additional insights or methods for measuring LVDS signals.
  • One suggestion involves using two single-ended probes with a 100-ohm resistor between them to measure the difference between the signals, with a note that the oscilloscope should be set to read the differential signal.
  • Another participant cautions against using the 100-ohm resistor if a terminated LVDS receiver is already in place, advocating for measuring each signal with respect to ground and visually subtracting them.
  • A proposal is made to build an op-amp circuit to take the difference between the two signals, although it is noted that the oscilloscope may handle this calculation directly.
  • One participant argues for the value of observing the two signals as single-ended traces with their grounds overlaid, suggesting this method provides clearer insight into the behavior of each line.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the best approach to measuring LVDS signals, with no clear consensus on the optimal method. Some advocate for differential measurement techniques, while others prefer single-ended observations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors that could affect measurement, including impedance matching, the need for amplification, and the specifics of the LVDS signal characteristics, which remain unspecified.

mariam.f
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello
I would like to measure a LVDS signal, on the board that is sending this signal. There are two signal pins on this board for this signal, signal-p and signal-n. How can I measure this signal? Can I use single ended probes and an oscilliscope? I tried to do that but I can't find a signal. Am I making a mistake in measuring this way (what if so?) I don't have differential probes and they are expensive, is there another way?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello mariam.f. Welcome to the forum.

It might help to have some context. What is LVDS? What sort of voltage and current are you anticipating? What sort of frequency or rate of change in signal are you anticipating?

Probably what you want to do is Google up the maker of the sensor and find out what they suggest for getting the signal collected.

If you are talking about a "few" volts with frequencies up to a few mega-hertz you may get good results with an oscilloscope. You may need to put in some resistors to match impedance to get a good signal. The usual situation for a scope is a very high resistance across the leads. This may not be suitable for the kind of sensor you are using. Maybe what you need to do is put a resistor across the leads of the scope to balance things. If you have a high-end scope you may be able to coax it to collect and store the data for you.

If you are talking about milli-volts the scope may, or may not, let you go that low. You might need an amplifier. You might need a power source going through the sensor. Before you start guessing, you almost certainly need that info from the maker of the sensor.
 
Use two single ended probes with a 100 ohm resistor between them (one side of the resistor connected to each to probes). Attach one probe to signal-p and the other to signal-n. Then, in your oscilloscope, set the readout for the difference between the probes (may be called A-B or DIFF, it depends on different scopes). Then you should see your signal.
 
Don't use the 100 ohm resistor if you are measuring with a terminated LVDS receiver already attached. But, otherwise analogdesign is correct.

Basically measure each signal with respect to ground and subtract them, either visually (which I do most often) or with "scope math".
 
One possibility is to build a simple op-amp circuit that will take the difference between the two signals (p and n) but if your scope will take the difference for you then analogdesign's suggestion is the best.
 
Again, no reason to subtract them in the scope or an opamp. I find it is actually more meaningful to look at the two signals single ended with the scope trace grounds overlayed. That way you see what each line is doing, and it is easy to subtract them visually.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: leright

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
960
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K