Measuring the mass and linear dimensions of the block

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the density of a rectangular block using its mass and linear dimensions, specifically addressing the uncertainties involved in the measurement. The mass is recorded as (25.0 ± 0.1)g, and the dimensions are (5.00 ± 0.01) cm, (2.00 ± 0.01) cm, and (1.00 ± 0.01) cm. The calculated density is 2.50 g/cm³, with the correct uncertainty determined to be ± 0.05 g/cm³, as derived from the total fractional uncertainty method. Participants clarify the distinction between absolute and fractional uncertainties in the context of this calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly density calculations.
  • Familiarity with measurement uncertainties and their types.
  • Knowledge of fractional uncertainty and how to apply it in calculations.
  • Ability to perform basic arithmetic operations with measurements and uncertainties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of measurement uncertainty in physics.
  • Learn how to calculate fractional uncertainties in various contexts.
  • Explore the concept of absolute vs. relative uncertainties in scientific measurements.
  • Practice density calculations with different materials and their uncertainties.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching measurement techniques, and anyone involved in experimental science requiring precise calculations of density and uncertainty.

jinx007
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
The density of the material of a rectangular block is determined by measuring the mass and
linear dimensions of the block. The table shows the results obtained, together with their
uncertainties.

mass = (25.0 ± 0.1)g
length = (5.00 ± 0.01) cm
breadth = (2.00 ± 0.01) cm
height = (1.00 ± 0.01) cm

The density is calculated to be 2.50gcm–3
.

What is the uncertainty in this result?
A ± 0.01gcm–3
B ± 0.02 gcm–3
C ± 0.05 gcm–3
D ± 0.13gcm–3


According to the book the answer is C and i am having D as answer..

my work

(o.01) x 3 = 0.3

0.3 + 0.01 = 0.13

i cannot figure out where is the mistake help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you should add up the fractional uncertainties not the absolute uncertainties.
 
arkofnoah said:
you should add up the fractional uncertainties not the absolute uncertainties.

aww fractional error...but the question deal with uncertainty..can you start it for be i will get a better idea
 
jinx007 said:
aww fractional error...but the question deal with uncertainty..can you start it for be i will get a better idea

?? I don't get you.
 
arkofnoah said:
?? I don't get you.

the question is about uncertainty..why are you working with fractional error...please start the number...work out the first part i will get a better idea of how to attempt the question
 
jinx007 said:
the question is about uncertainty..why are you working with fractional error...please start the number...work out the first part i will get a better idea of how to attempt the question

isn't fractional uncertainty (or fractional error if you choose to go by that name) a form of uncertainty? i don't get what's the issue here :confused: and what do you mean by the "first part"?

but anyway the full solution is just this:

total fractional uncertainty: 0.1/25 + 0.01/5 + 0.01/2 + 0.01/1 = 0.021
total absolute uncertainty: 0.021 x 25/(5 x 2 x 1) = 0.0525 = 0.05 gcm^-3
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
17K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K