Mechanical Engineering: Major Remorse?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the experiences and concerns of a junior in Mechanical Engineering who is contemplating the balance between theoretical and practical aspects of the major. The focus includes the challenges of coursework involving design software like AutoCAD and Solidworks, and the desire to pursue more theoretical work, possibly through graduate studies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses dissatisfaction with practical courses and questions the suitability of the major for their interests in theory.
  • Another suggests that graduate school could be a viable path for those interested in research and theoretical exploration, mentioning alternatives like applied physics.
  • A participant argues that while basic skills in engineering drawing are essential, the learning process may not be engaging.
  • Some participants note that there are opportunities in industry for those focused on analysis rather than design.
  • It is mentioned that many engineers in firms do not use design software directly, as this is often the role of drafters or designers.
  • One participant proposes specializing in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) as a way to focus on theory without engaging with design software.
  • A suggestion is made to consider a career as a Stress Analyst, which involves analysis rather than design, and offers a more solitary work environment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the balance between theory and practical work in Mechanical Engineering. While some suggest that there are paths available for those who prefer analysis, others highlight the necessity of practical skills in engineering education. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the best approach for students with similar concerns.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying perspectives on the importance of practical skills versus theoretical knowledge in engineering, and the potential career paths available for those with different interests. There are also references to specific job roles and required skills, but no definitive conclusions are drawn about the best course of action for the original poster.

eurekameh
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
I'm a junior in Mechanical Engineering and while I like a lot of it (the theory, that is), there are also some classes that uses AutoCAD and Solidworks or the like that I really do not enjoy. The fact that I think this is really what the job actually entails makes matters worse. What can I do if I want to focus more on the theory rather than on the hands-on, teamwork, product design aspect of things?

Perhaps this major is not my cup of tea and I should do something more theory based? Switching majors is really not an option for me because I've already taken a lot of my major classes, so I'm thinking graduate school could be an option. Any thoughts / advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eurekameh said:
I'm a junior in Mechanical Engineering and while I like a lot of it (the theory, that is), there are also some classes that uses AutoCAD and Solidworks or the like that I really do not enjoy. The fact that I think this is really what the job actually entails makes matters worse. What can I do if I want to focus more on the theory rather than on the hands-on, teamwork, product design aspect of things?

Perhaps this major is not my cup of tea and I should do something more theory based? Switching majors is really not an option for me because I've already taken a lot of my major classes, so I'm thinking graduate school could be an option. Any thoughts / advice?

Well, if you're interested in research and/or deep theoretical exploration, then you'll obviously want to go to graduate school. Engineering programs aim for work in the industry, so they are very practical in nature. You might want to think, whether you want to do your grad school in mechanical engineering or e.g. applied physics, technical mechanics or something else.
 
A course that is only aimed at "teaching how to use AutoCAD" would lbe poor IMO. But a counrse that is "teaching how to make engineering drawings that follow accepted standards, and interpret them correctly" is giving you a basic skill you need for any sort of mech eng work.

It might not be a very interesting learning process, but it's as essential as knowing now to read and write your native language.
 
There is plenty of opportunity in industry for those who are more interested in the analysis side of things.
 
Not to mention in most enginieering firms the engineers are rarely required to touch the design software, that is generally left to the drafters/designers.

But if you don't want teamwork, problem solving, as well as the mundane stuff like paperwork, dealing with contractors and vendors, etc. then, well, I'm not sure. There are many opportunities for ME's to get into work that does not require any design at all.
 
If you enjoy the theory rather than the practical side then you can specialise in things like CFD. You won't touch solidworks there, instead will be spending your time in Fortran or C++ doing some funky maths. A lot of research opportunities in that area too if my observation is correct.
 
I would look into being a Stress Analyst. You spend a lot of time thinking about how forces are acting on specific parts or assemblies. No designing required. Also, there is a lot of alone time with the computer. Here's a job description I found on a job search engine. Here are the skills that you would need to be a stress analyst for this company:

Job Title: Structural Analyst/Stress Engineer
Required Skills: Structural Analyst, Engineering, HEAT, NASTRAN
Domain: Manufacturing, Leading Avionics

Qualifications:
• Any Exp with NASTRAN would be helpful.
• Requires a bachelor's degree in engineering Aerospace or Mechanical Engineering

Responsibilities:
• Conduct structural analysis using ANSYS finite modeling and hand calculations.
• Size structure for proof, burst, LCF, HCF, TMF and crack growth.
• Prepare materials for design reviews and document in reports and presentations.
• Provides expert consultation in one or more areas for the design, development and implementation of technical products and systems. Recognized as technical leader and resource.
• Recommends alterations and enhancements to improve quality of products and/or procedures.
• Responsible for all internal activities and product development.
• Demonstrates expertise in a variety of the field's concepts, practices, and procedures.
• Relies on extensive experience and judgment to plan and accomplish goals.
• Performs a variety of tasks.
• May provide consultation on complex projects and is considered to be the top level contributor/specialist.
• A wide degree of creativity and latitude is expected.
• May report to an executive or a manager.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Programs Materials Engineering Undergrad Reflection
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
How Can I Stand Out in My Mechanical Engineering Major?
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Other Mechanical drafter moving to electrical engineering
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Chem Eng Masters: Major for Chemistry/Phys or Chem/Mech?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Is electrical engineering a good major for machine learning/AI jobs?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Programs Engineering Triple Major (Mechanical, Electrical, Computer Science)
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
Programs Which Major Should I Choose: Physics or Mechanical Engineering?
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Other Engineering Physics vs Pure Physics
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Programs Help on Majors and Graduate Degrees as an Engineering Student
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
What's the best major between Physics & Chemistry for entering MS in Nuclear Engineering?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K