Mechanics of materials -- deformation problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on a deformation problem in a statically indeterminate structure involving beams MN and NM. The user is attempting to determine the downward displacement of point N due to a uniform load acting on the beam. Key concepts include the method of superposition for analyzing deflections and the implications of having redundant supports in the structure. The user expresses uncertainty about their approach and seeks validation of their equations of deformation, specifically d(N)-d(M)=d(Lmn) and the relationship between the left and right beams.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statically indeterminate structures
  • Familiarity with the method of superposition in structural analysis
  • Knowledge of beam deflection equations
  • Basic principles of structural mechanics, including support reactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of superposition in greater detail for complex beam problems
  • Explore advanced beam deflection theories, including Euler-Bernoulli beam theory
  • Learn about the effects of redundant supports on structural behavior
  • Investigate software tools for structural analysis, such as SAP2000 or ANSYS
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and professionals involved in analyzing and designing statically indeterminate structures will benefit from this discussion.

Yossi33
Messages
22
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
find the deformation of the structure and find delta(N).
Relevant Equations
deformations equations
Motif-1.jpg

Hi, i'm struggling with that problem , i need to find the distance that point N went down.My way of thinking is that the structure is twice not statically determined because of the beam MN and beacuse of the left support which is also unnecessary in order for equilibrium. My 2 equations of deformation in order to find the variables are d(N)-d(M)=d(Lmn) and d(N) of the left beam equal to the d(N) of the right beam.
i thought to denote the force of the beam as N and then to divide to to each beam (pic 1) then i got the problem that i have a beam with no support and a force that causing it do go down, so i tought (pic 2 ) that the beam NM is equal to support there and got the problem that if there is a support it wont get down. in addition to that i cant figure out if the force that bending one beam is causing the torsion of the other , because the left doesnt resist that its only has a translational resistance. I wonder if my initial analysis is somehow correct and what other perspective there is to solve problems like this. thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The posted diagram is very difficult to read.
What is causing node N to move downwards?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Yossi33
W the uniform load acts on the beam , that casues the member NM to stretch and as a result , bending down the upper structure.
Note 10 Jan 2023 (1)-1.jpg
Note 10 Jan 2023-1.jpg
 
Thank you.
Is node M perfectly articulated in the three directions of the links converging at it?
If so, it seems that link TM can be removed with no consequences for our problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Yossi33
no , also in the diagram you can see that it is a half node and the upper structure TMS is continous . and i did some extra black there to emphasize the rigidity of the 90 degree.
.- edit - that is why i said that the structure is two times statically indeterminate.
 
Have you studied the method of superposition, which states that the deflection at any point on the beam is equal to the resultant of the slopes or deflections at that point caused by each of the load acting separately?
 
yes, that is why i stated that my first try was to compare the displacements of point M , and the solution is 2 equations of deformations because the structure is twice statically indeterminate but i try to solve that and i dont know if its right or no . can you tell me if its ok or if im in the right direction? , its in the pdf
 

Attachments

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K