Mechanics of Materials: Statically Indeterminate Problems

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
jdawg
Messages
366
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Hi! So my question isn't really about a specific problem, but more of when to use which method.
I'm having trouble knowing when to use the method of super position, the force method, or just being able to go straight into just writing the equilibrium equation and the compatibility relation.

Homework Equations


δ = (F*L)/(A*E)

The Attempt at a Solution


For example, in the problem I attached I originally just summed the forces in the x direction and then wrote out my compatibility relation:

FEF - 2FAB = 80 kN (Because of symmetry let FAB = FCD

δAB = δEF

And then I just solved for my forces using these two equations. But this was incorrect, I don't understand why this doesn't work (The solution I looked at used the method of super position). The total deformation between the two rigid walls should be zero, right? Shouldn't the compression in rods AB and CD equal the expansion in rod EF?

Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • 370_P4.43.png
    370_P4.43.png
    14 KB · Views: 873
Physics news on Phys.org
jdawg said:

Homework Statement


Hi! So my question isn't really about a specific problem, but more of when to use which method.
I'm having trouble knowing when to use the method of super position, the force method, or just being able to go straight into just writing the equilibrium equation and the compatibility relation.

Homework Equations


δ = (F*L)/(A*E)

The Attempt at a Solution


For example, in the problem I attached I originally just summed the forces in the x direction and then wrote out my compatibility relation:

FEF - 2FAB = 80 kN (Because of symmetry let FAB = FCD
ok
δAB = δEF
ok
And then I just solved for my forces using these two equations. But this was incorrect, I don't understand why this doesn't work (The solution I looked at used the method of super position). The total deformation between the two rigid walls should be zero, right? Shouldn't the compression in rods AB and CD equal the expansion in rod EF?
yes
Thanks for any help!
you have a signage error on your first equation. The left sections are in compression and the right section is in tension. Draw free body diagrams and correct your signage.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CivilSigma and jdawg
Thanks so much! I can't believe I made that mistake. So just to clarify, you can pretty much use whichever method as long as you are careful?
 
jdawg said:
Thanks so much! I can't believe I made that mistake. So just to clarify, you can pretty much use whichever method as long as you are careful?
Yes, use the method that is easier for you , they all lead to the same result.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jdawg