Mechanics of Materials: Statically Indeterminate Problems

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods for solving statically indeterminate problems in mechanics of materials, specifically focusing on when to use the method of superposition, the force method, or equilibrium equations combined with compatibility relations. The scope includes homework-related queries and conceptual clarifications regarding these methods.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about when to use different methods for solving statically indeterminate problems, mentioning the method of superposition, the force method, and equilibrium equations.
  • The participant attempts to solve a problem by summing forces and writing compatibility relations but finds their approach incorrect, leading to questions about the total deformation between rigid walls.
  • Another participant points out a signage error in the equations, suggesting that free body diagrams should be drawn to correct the signage.
  • There is a suggestion that as long as one is careful, any method can be used, and they will lead to the same result.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method to use, as there are differing opinions on the appropriateness of each method in specific contexts. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal approach for various problems.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the importance of careful application of methods and the potential for errors in signage, indicating that assumptions about deformation and symmetry may need further clarification.

jdawg
Messages
366
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Hi! So my question isn't really about a specific problem, but more of when to use which method.
I'm having trouble knowing when to use the method of super position, the force method, or just being able to go straight into just writing the equilibrium equation and the compatibility relation.

Homework Equations


δ = (F*L)/(A*E)

The Attempt at a Solution


For example, in the problem I attached I originally just summed the forces in the x direction and then wrote out my compatibility relation:

FEF - 2FAB = 80 kN (Because of symmetry let FAB = FCD

δAB = δEF

And then I just solved for my forces using these two equations. But this was incorrect, I don't understand why this doesn't work (The solution I looked at used the method of super position). The total deformation between the two rigid walls should be zero, right? Shouldn't the compression in rods AB and CD equal the expansion in rod EF?

Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • 370_P4.43.png
    370_P4.43.png
    14 KB · Views: 860
Physics news on Phys.org
jdawg said:

Homework Statement


Hi! So my question isn't really about a specific problem, but more of when to use which method.
I'm having trouble knowing when to use the method of super position, the force method, or just being able to go straight into just writing the equilibrium equation and the compatibility relation.

Homework Equations


δ = (F*L)/(A*E)

The Attempt at a Solution


For example, in the problem I attached I originally just summed the forces in the x direction and then wrote out my compatibility relation:

FEF - 2FAB = 80 kN (Because of symmetry let FAB = FCD
ok
δAB = δEF
ok
And then I just solved for my forces using these two equations. But this was incorrect, I don't understand why this doesn't work (The solution I looked at used the method of super position). The total deformation between the two rigid walls should be zero, right? Shouldn't the compression in rods AB and CD equal the expansion in rod EF?
yes
Thanks for any help!
you have a signage error on your first equation. The left sections are in compression and the right section is in tension. Draw free body diagrams and correct your signage.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CivilSigma and jdawg
Thanks so much! I can't believe I made that mistake. So just to clarify, you can pretty much use whichever method as long as you are careful?
 
jdawg said:
Thanks so much! I can't believe I made that mistake. So just to clarify, you can pretty much use whichever method as long as you are careful?
Yes, use the method that is easier for you , they all lead to the same result.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jdawg

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K