Mechanics problem (Bullet penetration)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 7.00g bullet penetrating a block of wood, first when the block is held in a vise and then when it is free on a frictionless surface. The objective is to determine the penetration depth of the bullet in the second scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of momentum and energy principles to analyze the penetration depth in both cases. There are attempts to derive equations relating the forces, penetration depths, and velocities involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints and corrections regarding the conservation principles applicable to the problem. There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between the variables, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the implications of inelastic collisions on the equations used.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of having multiple unknowns in their equations, which complicates the analysis. There is also a mention of potential arithmetic discrepancies in the final calculations of penetration depth.

tanzl
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 7.00g bullet, when ired from a gun into a 1.00kg block of wood held in a vise, penetrates the block to a depth of 8.00cm. This block of wood is placed on a frictionless horizontal surface, and a second 7.00g bullet is fired from the gun into the block. To what depth will the bullet penetrate the block in this case?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


In the first case, by taking the final velocity as 0 and displacement as 8.00cm.
I can get the initial velocity of bullet in terms of acceleration or time by using kinematics equations.
or I can find the force of the bullet exerts on the block by equating EK = F\Deltar
But they are not seems to be useful in case 2.

In case 2, I am not sure how the mechanics will occur. But, I think the bullet will travel with the same initial velocity, penetrate a shorter distance into the block and bring the block to travel with it with some velocity. I do not know how to put this by using physical principals. I guess I need to use conservation of energy again. By equating
EK of bullet = F\Deltar + EK of (bullet + block). But I do not think I have enough information to do that. Please help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're on the right track. Hint: What else is conserved during the collision of bullet and block in case 2?
 
I think momentum is conserved which gives
\frac{1}{2}mv1 = (M+m)v2 ...(1)
where m=mass of bullet
M=mass of block
v1=initial velocity of bullet
v2=velocity of bullet and block

From the 1st case,
I have \frac{1}{2}mv12 = F\Deltar1 ... (2)

From the 2nd case,
\frac{1}{2}mv12 = F\Deltar2 + \frac{1}{2}mv22... (3)

By equating (3) and (2)
I have F(\Deltar1-\Deltar2) = \frac{1}{2}(M+m)v22

But I still have one extra unknown (r2 , F , v1) for 2 equations.
I have one more question here, if I had assumed that the collision is inelastic, will (3) still correct since the kinetic energy is not conserved anymore.
 
Last edited:
tanzl said:
I think momentum is conserved which gives
\frac{1}{2}mv1 = (M+m)v2 ...(1)
where m=mass of bullet
M=mass of block
v1=initial velocity of bullet
v2=velocity of bullet and block
Good. But get rid of that 1/2.

From the 1st case,
I have \frac{1}{2}mv12 = F\Deltar1 ... (2)
Good.

From the 2nd case,
\frac{1}{2}mv12 = F\Deltar2 + \frac{1}{2}mv22... (3)
Good, but that second "m" should be "M + m".

By equating (3) and (2)
I have F(\Deltar1-\Deltar2) = \frac{1}{2}(M+m)v22

But I still have one extra unknown (r2 , F , v1) for 2 equations.
You have 3 equations. In any case, noodle around with the equations, expressing everything in terms of F, r_1, & r_2. See what happens.
I have one more question here, if I had assumed that the collision is inelastic, will (3) still correct since the kinetic energy is not conserved anymore.
The collision is most definitely inelastic. KE is not conserved--total energy is conserved. (Your equation 3 is a total energy equation, not simply a KE equation.)
 
Oops... I apologise for all the typing errors.

Wow, the unknowns canceled like magic. Thank you so much.
The final answer I got is 7.994cm. Not much different from the first penetration.
 
I get a slightly different answer, so you might want to recheck your arithmetic. But there's not much difference.
 
I recheck my arithmetic. There is nothing wrong.

The final expression I get is
mv12 = mv12*\frac{\Delta r_2}{\Delta r_1} + \frac{m^2}{M+m}*v12

Canceled off all the v and m gives
\Deltar2 = \frac{M}{M+m}*\Deltar1
= 1/1.007 * 0.08
= 0.07994m
 
tanzl said:
Canceled off all the v gives
\Deltar2 = \frac{M}{M+m}*\Deltar1
Right.
= 1/1.007 * 0.08
= 0.07994m
According to my calculator, 1/1.007 * 0.08 = 0.07944 m.
 
Yea.. Thank you so much for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K