Mechanics problem (Bullet penetration)

tanzl
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 7.00g bullet, when ired from a gun into a 1.00kg block of wood held in a vise, penetrates the block to a depth of 8.00cm. This block of wood is placed on a frictionless horizontal surface, and a second 7.00g bullet is fired from the gun into the block. To what depth will the bullet penetrate the block in this case?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


In the first case, by taking the final velocity as 0 and displacement as 8.00cm.
I can get the initial velocity of bullet in terms of acceleration or time by using kinematics equations.
or I can find the force of the bullet exerts on the block by equating EK = F[tex]\Delta[/tex]r
But they are not seems to be useful in case 2.

In case 2, I am not sure how the mechanics will occur. But, I think the bullet will travel with the same initial velocity, penetrate a shorter distance into the block and bring the block to travel with it with some velocity. I do not know how to put this by using physical principals. I guess I need to use conservation of energy again. By equating
EK of bullet = F[tex]\Delta[/tex]r + EK of (bullet + block). But I do not think I have enough information to do that. Please help me.
 
You're on the right track. Hint: What else is conserved during the collision of bullet and block in case 2?
 
I think momentum is conserved which gives
[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]mv1 = (M+m)v2 ...(1)
where m=mass of bullet
M=mass of block
v1=initial velocity of bullet
v2=velocity of bullet and block

From the 1st case,
I have [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]mv12 = F[tex]\Delta[/tex]r1 ... (2)

From the 2nd case,
[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]mv12 = F[tex]\Delta[/tex]r2 + [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]mv22... (3)

By equating (3) and (2)
I have F([tex]\Delta[/tex]r1-[tex]\Delta[/tex]r2) = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex](M+m)v22

But I still have one extra unknown (r2 , F , v1) for 2 equations.
I have one more question here, if I had assumed that the collision is inelastic, will (3) still correct since the kinetic energy is not conserved anymore.
 
Last edited:
tanzl said:
I think momentum is conserved which gives
[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]mv1 = (M+m)v2 ...(1)
where m=mass of bullet
M=mass of block
v1=initial velocity of bullet
v2=velocity of bullet and block
Good. But get rid of that 1/2.

From the 1st case,
I have [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]mv12 = F[tex]\Delta[/tex]r1 ... (2)
Good.

From the 2nd case,
[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]mv12 = F[tex]\Delta[/tex]r2 + [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]mv22... (3)
Good, but that second "m" should be "M + m".

By equating (3) and (2)
I have F([tex]\Delta[/tex]r1-[tex]\Delta[/tex]r2) = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex](M+m)v22

But I still have one extra unknown (r2 , F , v1) for 2 equations.
You have 3 equations. In any case, noodle around with the equations, expressing everything in terms of F, r_1, & r_2. See what happens.
I have one more question here, if I had assumed that the collision is inelastic, will (3) still correct since the kinetic energy is not conserved anymore.
The collision is most definitely inelastic. KE is not conserved--total energy is conserved. (Your equation 3 is a total energy equation, not simply a KE equation.)
 
Oops... I apologise for all the typing errors.

Wow, the unknowns canceled like magic. Thank you so much.
The final answer I got is 7.994cm. Not much different from the first penetration.
 
I get a slightly different answer, so you might want to recheck your arithmetic. But there's not much difference.
 
I recheck my arithmetic. There is nothing wrong.

The final expression I get is
mv12 = mv12*[tex]\frac{\Delta r_2}{\Delta r_1}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{m^2}{M+m}[/tex]*v12

Canceled off all the v and m gives
[tex]\Delta[/tex]r2 = [tex]\frac{M}{M+m}[/tex]*[tex]\Delta[/tex]r1
= 1/1.007 * 0.08
= 0.07994m
 
tanzl said:
Canceled off all the v gives
[tex]\Delta[/tex]r2 = [tex]\frac{M}{M+m}[/tex]*[tex]\Delta[/tex]r1
Right.
= 1/1.007 * 0.08
= 0.07994m
According to my calculator, 1/1.007 * 0.08 = 0.07944 m.
 
Yea.. Thank you so much for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K