Medical Physicists in Healthcare Settings: Pros/Cons

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the career choice between becoming a medical physicist and a nuclear medicine physician. It highlights the distinction in status between PhD medical physicists and MDs in healthcare settings, noting that while both roles are crucial, MDs have the legal authority to interact with patients, which affects their standing in clinical environments. Medical physicists typically focus on research and equipment testing, often collaborating with physicians in clinical studies. For those considering this career path, gaining firsthand experience through shadowing or internships is recommended to better understand the job realities. Additionally, there are inquiries about the competitiveness of medical physics training programs, particularly in the UK, and concerns regarding the lack of experimental physics experience for applicants.
shan564
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Are there any medical physicists here? I am trying to decide between a career as a medical physicist or as a nuclear medicine physician (I just finished my undergrad in chemistry, so I think I can still go either way). I think I'm more interested in the physics side of things than the medicine side... but before I decide for sure, I thought I'd ask to see how physicists are regarded in hospital settings.

Do PhD medical physicists have the same status as MDs in healthcare settings?

Do you have any recommendations that would influence my decision? Are there any big pros or cons to doing either one or the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhDs and MDs are not given the same status in healthcare settings, but that's because they legally can't do the same things. The Ph.D.s might know how everything works, but only MDs are licensed to touch a patient. But, that doesn't mean they don't work closely together in fields like nuclear medicine. A physicist would be working on the research side of things, and if you're doing something where you're testing equipment in an actual clinical setting, not developing the machines in a laboratory, you will have to work with MDs to assist on any clinical studies.

If you have two specific fields that interest you, and you want to see what's different about them, I suggest contacting people who do that sort of work and see if you can shadow them (on the medical side) or do an internship with them (on the research side) to see what the job is really like and if the job realities fit with your expectations/interests.
 
I've been thinking about going into medical physics too. I live in the UK and I'm currently doing an Mphys in mathematical physics. Does anyone know how easy it would be for me to be accepted into the NHS medical physics training programme? I hear it's quite competitive and my degree doesn't give me a lot of experience in experimental physics.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K