Mellin transform of Dirac delta function ##\delta(t-a)##

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Mellin transform of the Dirac delta function, specifically ##\delta(t-a)##. Participants explore the relationship between the Mellin and Laplace transforms and the implications of using the Dirac delta function in these contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the Mellin transform and expresses uncertainty about applying the residue theorem due to the absence of singularities. Other participants question the equivalence of different notations and formulations found in sources like Wikipedia.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the definitions and transformations involved. There is a recognition of potential mistakes in previous posts, and some participants are clarifying their understanding of the transforms and their applications.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific conditions, such as ##a>0## for the Dirac delta function, and discussions about the implications of using different variables in the transforms. The conversation reflects a mix of interpretations and approaches without reaching a consensus.

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
Mellin transform of Dirac delta function ##\delta(t-a)##
Relevant Equations
##F(s)= \int_0^{\infty} \delta (t-a)e^{-st} dt##

##f(t) = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_{\gamma - i \omega}^{\gamma +i \omega} F(s) e^{st} ds##
Hi,
I found Laplace transform of this Dirac delta function which is ##F(s) = e^{-st}## since ##\int_{\infty}^{-\infty} f(t) \delta (t-a) dt = f(a)##
and that ##\delta(x) = 0## if ##x \neq 0##

Then the Mellin transform
##f(t) = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_{\gamma - i \omega}^{\gamma +i \omega} e^{-sa} e^{st} ds##
Since there's no singularity I can't use the residue theorem, so I'm not sure what else can I use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I made a mistake, if someone can edit the post I would say the inverse Mellin transform.
 
You use e but wiki uses x as
The Mellin transform of a function f is

{\displaystyle \left\{{\mathcal {M}}f\right\}(s)=\varphi (s)=\int _{0}^{\infty }x^{s-1}f(x)\,dx.}
Are they equivalent?
1647860532674.png

Let ##f(x)=\delta(x-a)## a>0
\{Mf\}(s)= a^{s-1}
\{M^{-1}\phi\}(x)= \frac{1}{2\pi i a}\int_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty} t^{-s} ds
where t=x/a. It should be ##\delta(x-a)##.

I observe expression of delta(x) in Fourier transform\delta(x)=\frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{-i\infty}^{i\infty}e^{px} dp
is useful for the proof.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K