Mellin transform of Dirac delta function ##\delta(t-a)##

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Mellin transform of the Dirac delta function ##\delta(t-a)##, establishing that the Laplace transform is ##F(s) = e^{-st}##. The participant attempts to derive the Mellin transform using the formula ##f(t) = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_{\gamma - i \omega}^{\gamma +i \omega} e^{-sa} e^{st} ds## but encounters difficulties due to the absence of singularities. They reference the inverse Mellin transform and clarify that the expression for the delta function in the Fourier transform is relevant for their proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transforms and their properties
  • Familiarity with Mellin transforms and their definitions
  • Knowledge of the Dirac delta function and its applications
  • Basic complex analysis, particularly the residue theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Mellin transform in detail
  • Learn about the inverse Mellin transform and its applications
  • Explore the relationship between Fourier and Mellin transforms
  • Investigate complex analysis techniques relevant to transform theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with transform methods, particularly those interested in the applications of the Dirac delta function in signal processing and analysis.

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
Mellin transform of Dirac delta function ##\delta(t-a)##
Relevant Equations
##F(s)= \int_0^{\infty} \delta (t-a)e^{-st} dt##

##f(t) = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_{\gamma - i \omega}^{\gamma +i \omega} F(s) e^{st} ds##
Hi,
I found Laplace transform of this Dirac delta function which is ##F(s) = e^{-st}## since ##\int_{\infty}^{-\infty} f(t) \delta (t-a) dt = f(a)##
and that ##\delta(x) = 0## if ##x \neq 0##

Then the Mellin transform
##f(t) = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \int_{\gamma - i \omega}^{\gamma +i \omega} e^{-sa} e^{st} ds##
Since there's no singularity I can't use the residue theorem, so I'm not sure what else can I use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I made a mistake, if someone can edit the post I would say the inverse Mellin transform.
 
You use e but wiki uses x as
The Mellin transform of a function f is

{\displaystyle \left\{{\mathcal {M}}f\right\}(s)=\varphi (s)=\int _{0}^{\infty }x^{s-1}f(x)\,dx.}
Are they equivalent?
1647860532674.png

Let ##f(x)=\delta(x-a)## a>0
\{Mf\}(s)= a^{s-1}
\{M^{-1}\phi\}(x)= \frac{1}{2\pi i a}\int_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty} t^{-s} ds
where t=x/a. It should be ##\delta(x-a)##.

I observe expression of delta(x) in Fourier transform\delta(x)=\frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{-i\infty}^{i\infty}e^{px} dp
is useful for the proof.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K