Memory regarding specific instances.

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Peon666
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Memory Specific
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of memory retention, specifically why certain trivial instances are remembered for a long time while seemingly more important events are forgotten. Participants explore various explanations, including evolutionary perspectives, emotional influences, and neurological mechanisms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that evolutionary factors influence memory, with a focus on remembering unusual or surprising events rather than routine occurrences.
  • Others highlight the paradox of remembering trivial memories while forgetting more significant ones, questioning the criteria for what is deemed important.
  • One participant proposes that endocrine mechanisms or specific timing may play a role in memory formation.
  • Altered emotional or sensory states are discussed as factors that can enhance memory recall, with examples of how certain smells can trigger vivid memories.
  • There is a mention of the neural pathways linking smell and taste to memory, particularly their connection to the hippocampus.
  • Some participants challenge oversimplifications regarding the relationship between sensory experiences and memory, emphasizing the complexity of memory storage and retrieval.
  • Discussion includes the evolving understanding of memory storage in the brain, moving away from the idea of individual neurons holding specific memories to a more complex network of pathways.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the mechanisms behind memory retention, with no clear consensus on the reasons for the selective nature of memory. Multiple competing explanations are presented, indicating an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of empirical evidence for some claims, dependence on individual experiences, and the complexity of neurological processes involved in memory that remain inadequately understood.

Peon666
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
It's a common observation that sometimes the slightest occurrances are remebered by us for entires lives while we forget relatively important things quite soon. Why is this so? Why can't we remember other things just like these trivial things? Is our brain working at some extraordinary efficienty at those instances? Does medical science explain this phenomenon?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
From an evolutionary point of view - you are built to remember important things.
It's just the question of what is important.

You are here because your ancestors remembered things about where lions hunt or food gathered, so you are built to remember odd, unusual or surprising things happening around you. Siting in a physics lecture you are warm safe and comfortable so there is no evolutionary advantage in remembering anything happening - it isn't important.
 
You're right about us remembering important things but what I want to discuss is our remembering things which is NOT important at all while forgetting things which are RELATIVELY more important. Doesn't such things happen? We remember things/instances which have no importance whatsoever from past (like a glimpse that I was writing on a book in my KG class or that I was standing in street while a kid) while forgetting almost completely those things which, at least, are more important than these trivial instances.
 
It could be based of various endocrine mechanisms or catching a cell at the right time and place. That's my guess and two cents.
 
Altered emotional or sensory states - which actually may be totally unrelated to the trivial happening you remember - affect how well you remember it. And a similar stimulus may prompt the recall.

Example: In the US, some older people often recall Christmas mornings as children when peeling an orange. The strong smell of orange oil is associated with Christmas because 70 years ago, Christmas was the only time during the year when Northern US stores stocked oranges. So kids got them in their Christmas stocking. And peeled and ate them right away. Almost every person has one or more "pointless" memories evoked by a strong scent or smell.
 
Smell and taste are associated with many memories because the neural pathways link them directly to the hippocampus area of the brain.
 
hypatia said:
Smell and taste are associated with many memories because the neural pathways link them directly to the hippocampus area of the brain.

So I guess a wide array of different smells and tastes will cause someone to seize?

Seriously, that's a downright misleading oversimplification.
 
A normal person would not have seizures due to smells and tastes. Abnormal areas of the brain can send storms of neurons that may trigger seizures in people with epileptic seizures.
Science spent many years looking for the source of memory, what they called the Grandmother neuron. It was believed that one neuron held the memory of her face, another her laugh. Now they think differently. Now its believed memories are in the changed pathways of the neural net.
If one of the neurons dies {they die from the moment your born} in a pathway, the memory stored there become incomplete, or may vanish all together.
All memories, even vivid ones, are more or less accurate reconstructions. But memories often change.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
8K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
12K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K