I Mercury as a plasma at 150 Kelvin

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of creating mercury plasma at 150 Kelvin, with participants questioning the validity of such a theoretical engine. It is noted that at this temperature, mercury would likely be solid, contradicting the notion of it being in a plasma state. The low vapor pressure of mercury at 150 K means it cannot evaporate without significant heating, raising concerns about condensation on containment walls. Participants emphasize that pressurization alone cannot create plasma at such low temperatures. Ultimately, the thread concludes with a reminder to avoid engaging in pseudoscience discussions.
gary808
Messages
6
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
Can you have mercury as a plasma at 150 kelvin?
I was reading up on a theoretical engine employing the following, “Mercury plasma pressurized at 250k atmospheres, at a temperature of 150 degrees kelvin (-123° C), and swirled within its accelerator to 50k RPM.”

Does pressurizing mercury so much somehow allow a plasma to form at such sub-zero temperatures?
This seems to fly in the face of what I understand should be super-heated plasma.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Might help to say where you read it.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Ibix said:
Might help to say where you read it.
Or maybe not, since the source was not valid. :wink:

@gary808 -- your question is "Can you have mercury as a plasma at 150 kelvin?" right? What defines a plasma? What parameters (like pressure) can affect the plasma state other than temperature?

gary808 said:
Does pressurizing mercury so much somehow allow a plasma to form at such sub-zero temperatures?
 
  • Like
Likes gary808 and Ibix
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, gary808, berkeman and 1 other person
berkeman said:
Or maybe not, since the source was not valid. :wink:

@gary808 -- your question is "Can you have mercury as a plasma at 150 kelvin?" right? What defines a plasma? What parameters (like pressure) can affect the plasma state other than temperature?
Yes. My point is in debunking pseudo-science. Just wanted to double-check with the experts. Pressurization isn't a factor. If it's 150 kelvin, then it is likely a solid, or else it's not 150 kelvin but a super-heated plasma instead.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
gary808 said:
Yes. My point is in debunking pseudo-science. Just wanted to double-check with the experts. Pressurization isn't a factor. If it's 150 kelvin, then it is likely a solid, or else it's not 150 kelvin but a super-heated plasma instead.
We don't debunk pseudoscience at PF. Thread is closed.
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...

Similar threads

Replies
45
Views
11K
Replies
29
Views
15K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
23K