I Mercury as a plasma at 150 Kelvin

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of creating mercury plasma at 150 Kelvin, with participants questioning the validity of such a theoretical engine. It is noted that at this temperature, mercury would likely be solid, contradicting the notion of it being in a plasma state. The low vapor pressure of mercury at 150 K means it cannot evaporate without significant heating, raising concerns about condensation on containment walls. Participants emphasize that pressurization alone cannot create plasma at such low temperatures. Ultimately, the thread concludes with a reminder to avoid engaging in pseudoscience discussions.
gary808
Messages
6
Reaction score
6
TL;DR Summary
Can you have mercury as a plasma at 150 kelvin?
I was reading up on a theoretical engine employing the following, “Mercury plasma pressurized at 250k atmospheres, at a temperature of 150 degrees kelvin (-123° C), and swirled within its accelerator to 50k RPM.”

Does pressurizing mercury so much somehow allow a plasma to form at such sub-zero temperatures?
This seems to fly in the face of what I understand should be super-heated plasma.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Might help to say where you read it.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Ibix said:
Might help to say where you read it.
Or maybe not, since the source was not valid. :wink:

@gary808 -- your question is "Can you have mercury as a plasma at 150 kelvin?" right? What defines a plasma? What parameters (like pressure) can affect the plasma state other than temperature?

gary808 said:
Does pressurizing mercury so much somehow allow a plasma to form at such sub-zero temperatures?
 
  • Like
Likes gary808 and Ibix
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, gary808, berkeman and 1 other person
berkeman said:
Or maybe not, since the source was not valid. :wink:

@gary808 -- your question is "Can you have mercury as a plasma at 150 kelvin?" right? What defines a plasma? What parameters (like pressure) can affect the plasma state other than temperature?
Yes. My point is in debunking pseudo-science. Just wanted to double-check with the experts. Pressurization isn't a factor. If it's 150 kelvin, then it is likely a solid, or else it's not 150 kelvin but a super-heated plasma instead.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
gary808 said:
Yes. My point is in debunking pseudo-science. Just wanted to double-check with the experts. Pressurization isn't a factor. If it's 150 kelvin, then it is likely a solid, or else it's not 150 kelvin but a super-heated plasma instead.
We don't debunk pseudoscience at PF. Thread is closed.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
45
Views
11K
Replies
29
Views
15K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
23K
Back
Top