Metal Detector Thwarter: An Engineering Perspective on Foiling Security Systems

  • Thread starter Thread starter SELFMADE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Detector Metal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of a "thwarter box" designed to deceive metal detectors used in security settings such as airports and courts. The proposed device would consist of a transmitter and receiver, allowing it to mimic the presence of metal to avoid detection. However, the engineering feasibility is questioned due to potential lag time in signal processing, which may render the concept impractical. The forum ultimately prohibits discussions on illegal activities, leading to the thread's closure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic fields and signal transmission
  • Basic knowledge of metal detector technology and operation
  • Familiarity with engineering principles related to signal processing
  • Awareness of ethical considerations in engineering design
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of electromagnetic field theory
  • Study the design and functionality of metal detectors
  • Explore signal processing techniques in engineering
  • Investigate ethical frameworks in engineering practices
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, security technology developers, and professionals interested in the design and functionality of detection systems.

SELFMADE
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
I am first year EE student so forgive me if there is huge lack of knowledge. While reading ahead in my physics book I found out that metal detectors in airports, courts etc are basically transmitters and receivers. If metal gets in between the detector sets off the alarm.

What if then, there is a small box with one wall that can receive the signal and other that can transmit it to the detector's receiver? One which a perpetrator can strap on inside of his thigh for example.

Theoretically, this thwarter box can fool the detector is it?

I imagine the electricmagnetic field between the detector is almost instanteneous, meaning if any metal gets in between alarm is set off instanteneously. I further imagine that there will be lag time in the thwarther box to process the signal and transmit it. So does it make the idea unworkable from the inception?

Please no talk about how IMMORAL this thwarter box is. Talk only from engineering prespective please

thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
SELFMADE said:
Please no talk about how IMMORAL this thwarter box is. Talk only from engineering prespective please

thanks
Sorry, we don't allow discussion of illegal activities, theoretical or not. Thread locked.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K