Metal Magnetic Flux 9: Calculate Induced Current & Resistance

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating induced current and resistance in a loop formed by two sliding metal bars moving in a uniform magnetic field of 0.35 T. The rate of change of magnetic flux is determined using Faraday's law of induction, specifically the formula ε = Bvl, resulting in a value of 0.0736 T/s for the total induced electromotive force (emf). The induced current of 0.25 A leads to the calculation of total resistance using Ohm's Law, confirming the relationship between voltage, current, and resistance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Faraday's law of induction
  • Knowledge of Ohm's Law
  • Familiarity with magnetic flux concepts
  • Basic proficiency in physics equations related to electromagnetism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the applications of Faraday's law in different electromagnetic scenarios
  • Learn about the relationship between magnetic fields and induced currents
  • Explore advanced topics in electromagnetism, such as Lenz's law
  • Investigate practical experiments demonstrating induced current and resistance
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for physics exams, educators teaching electromagnetism, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of induced current and resistance in magnetic fields.

dangish
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
9. Two sliding metal bars of length l = 15.0 cm are moving along two parallel rails, in
opposite directions, with constant speeds of v = 0.7 m/s, as shown in the figure below.
The rails are located in a uniform magnetic field with a magnitude 0.35 T that is directed
into the page as shown.

(a) Calculate the rate of change of magnetic flux within the loop formed by the sliders
and the rails.

(b) In what direction does the induced current flow around the loop? Indicate this clearly
on the diagram and briefly justify your answer.

(c) If that current is 0.25 A, calculate the total resistance of the loop.

The picture is in the attachment if you need it.

I have an exam on monday, I am not very good at this stuff, the professors not giving solutions and I can't figure this one out.

only equation I found that was relevant is,

Integral of B.ds = u0I + u0e0 x(dfluxe/dt)

and integral of E.ds = -dfluxb/dt

Can someone please help me!
 

Attachments

  • Physics 1051.jpg
    Physics 1051.jpg
    7.6 KB · Views: 537
Physics news on Phys.org
To solve the problem you need to useFaraday's law of induction

In particular, \frac{d\Phi}{dt} = \epsilon = Bvl (This formula is in the "Direct evaluation of the change in flux" paragraph).
Substitute and you have your answer for a).

Part b) is just some basic knowledge of the direction of B knowing the direction of velocity and current.

For part c) you can use your \epsilon found in a) as Voltage (\epsilon stands for electromotive force, which is basically equivalent to voltage) and find R using Ohm's Law.R.
 
so that e is the rate of change of magnetic flux? what are the units for that? something per second I would imagine.
 
actually I guess the units are Tesla/s

And for part b you can just change that to voltage?
 
also, since there are two velocities, -0.7 and +0.7 m/s

which one should I use?
 
\epsilon is just a voltage, so it's measure in Volts.

How about using a summation with v=1.4ms-1 and then v=-1.4ms-1?
 
I vaguely understand what you mean by summation there
 
LaTeX Code: \\epsilon = (.35T)(.7m/s)(.15m) = .0368T/s is what I did for part a.)
 
dangish said:
I vaguely understand what you mean by summation there

Ok, let's think about the process itself.
The change in magnetic flux is proportional to the area swept by each bar.
In 1 second, the bar traveling to the right would have swept Acm^2.
During the same time, bar traveling to the left would have swept how much?
 
  • #10
It would have swept the exact same amount of area?
 
  • #11
-Acm^2
 
  • #12
Areas are not vectors. So just A cm^2, right?
 
  • #13
fair enough, where does this lead us exactly? I still don't know what to use for the velocity
 
  • #14
You should have two terms.
One for +0.7ms-1, one for -0.7ms-1, but you can neglect the minus of the latter.
 
  • #15
so would I have to use the same equation twice?
or are you saying I can just use e=(.35T)(.7m/s)(.15m)
 
  • #16
you have to use it twice.
 
  • #17
e1=(.35T)(.7m/s)(.15m) = .0368T/s

e2=(.35T?(.7m/s)(.15m)=.0368T/s

etot= e1+e2 = .0368T/s + .0368T/s = .0736T/s

is this correct?
 
  • #18
I believe so.
 
  • #19
thank you good sir, patience is a virtue, especially when dealing with me.

Cheers!
 
  • #20
You're welcome.

R.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K