Method of Images: Find Minimum Energy for Electron to Escape Metal Surface

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a point charge +q located near a conducting plane and requires finding the work done in moving the charge to infinity. It also asks for the minimum energy an electron must have to escape from the metal surface, starting from a distance of 0.1 nm from it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the work done in moving the charge and the energy required for an electron to escape the metal surface. There are questions about the equivalence of these two situations and the interpretation of the charge involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the analogy between the work done on the charge and the kinetic energy needed for the electron to escape. However, there is still uncertainty regarding the interpretation of the charge and the setup of the problem, with differing views on how the scenarios relate.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the conducting plate being held at zero potential and the nature of the charge being discussed. There is a focus on the fixed positions of the charge and the conducting plate in different scenarios.

bon
Messages
547
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A point charge +q is initially at distance x from a conducting plane of infinite extent and held at zero potential. Find the work done in moving the charge to an infinite distance from the plane. Hence find the minimum energy an electron must have in order to escape
from a metal surface (assume that it starts at a distance 0.1nm, which is about one atomic diameter, from it). Express your answer in electron-volts.
[Answers: q^2/(16πε0x) ; 3.6eV]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So I've worked out the work done and found this to be q^2/[16pi ε d] as required.

just not sure how to work out the minimum energy the electron in the surface must have to escape. don't see how this relates to the previous part. any help please? Thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
any ideas?
 
Presumably kicking an electron off the surface with enough kinetic energy to escape is equivalent to the work required to move an equivalent charge to infinity (that is sort of the defining characteristic of "escape velocity").

So if you plug in the fundamental charge and the given distance into your formula, and convert the result to electron volts, you should be golden.
 
Thanks but it's not clear to me how the two situations are the same. The first involves taking the charge q and moving it away from the conducting plate. The second involves leaving the plate and charge where they are and taking an electron from inside the plate... :S
 
If your charge q was -q instead, would that make any difference to the work you computed?
 
no but that wasn't what i meant.in the first case the conducting plate is fixed, while the charge q is taken off to infinity..

in the second case, the conducting plate AND the charge q is fixed while the electron is moved off to infinity..
 
I think we've got different interpretations of what the q represents.

In my mind, the q is the electron with its charge -e. It's been booted off the surface of the metal by an incoming photon and given some KE. Because the surface is held at constant zero potential (I suppose that it's grounded in some way), the +e charge "hole" that the electron made when it left is quickly filled by a conduction electron and the plate remains neutral.

Now the situation is analogous to removing a charge q (in this case q = -e) from the vicinity of the plate to infinity, where the KE given to the electron provides the energy to accomplish the work.
 
sorry - yes- id misread the question! Thank you so much"_)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K