Why Is the tt Component of the Metric Interpreted Differently in This Paper?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of the tt component of the metric in a specific paper, where the authors define g_{tt} as g(r) rather than the expected f(r)g(r). This discrepancy raises questions about the authors' reasoning and the implications for the overall metric. Participants seek clarification on the authors' methodology and the context of the paper. Understanding this interpretation is crucial for accurately applying the metric in relevant calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of clear definitions in theoretical physics.
vizart
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I am reading a paper and the authors read the tt component of the metric from the line element ds^2=f(r)[g(r) dt^2+h(r) dr^2] as g_{tt}=g(r) instead of (what I expect to be) g_{tt}=f(r) g(r)

Could somebody please explain to me why? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This seems strange. What is the paper?
 
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K