Metric Elements and Einstein Equations in a Variable-Dependent Formulation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eljose
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the formulation of the metric in general relativity, specifically metrics that depend on individual variables and their implications for the Einstein equations in vacuum. Participants explore the structure of the metric, the resulting Einstein equations, and the form of the Lagrangian associated with such metrics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a metric of the form ds² = f(t)dt² + g(x)dx² + H(y)dy² and questions whether this leads to the Einstein equations being of the form R_ii = 0 for i = t, x, y.
  • Another participant agrees with the first claim, stating that they tested a similar line element in GrTensor II and found that the Riemann, Ricci, and Einstein tensors were all zero.
  • A different participant introduces a "mixed" metric form, suggesting ds² = f(t)dt² + g_ij dx^i dx^j, indicating a potential variation in the metric structure.
  • Another participant discusses a transformation of coordinates to T, X, and Y, which simplifies the metric to a form resembling Minkowski space, raising questions about the implications of such transformations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is some agreement on the implications of the proposed metric forms leading to zero Riemann and Ricci tensors, but the introduction of mixed metrics and coordinate transformations indicates that multiple views and interpretations are present in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the implications of the mixed metric form or the effects of coordinate transformations on the Einstein equations. Assumptions about the nature of the variables and their independence are not fully explored.

eljose
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
I have two questions...let's suppose we have a metric in the form:

[tex]ds^2 =f(t)dt^2 +g(x)dx^2 +H(y)dy^2[/tex]

So every element of the metric only depend on a variable..my question is..does this mean that the Einstein Equations (vaccuum) are of the form:

[tex]R_ii =0[/tex] i=t,x,y ?..

-And the second question is i know that [tex]det(g_ab )=f(t)g(x)H(y)[/tex] but ..what's the form of the Lagrangian?..i guess:

[tex]L= \int_ V dVf(t)g(x)H(y)(f(t)R_00 +g(x)R_11+ H(y)R_22 )[/tex]:rolleyes: :cool: :frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eljose said:
I have two questions...let's suppose we have a metric in the form:

[tex]ds^2 =f(t)dt^2 +g(x)dx^2 +H(y)dy^2[/tex]

So every element of the metric only depend on a variable..my question is..does this mean that the Einstein Equations (vaccuum) are of the form:

[tex]R_ii =0[/tex] i=t,x,y ?..

Yep. I threw this line element (with a k(z) dz^2 term added) into GrTensor II, the Riemann was zero, as well as the Ricci and the Einstein.
 
And a "Mixed" one?.. [tex]ds^2 = f(t)dt^2 + g_ij dx^i dx^j[/tex] Where Einstein summation is assumed...
 
This line element is just a simple diffeomorphism of normal Minkowski space. Consider changing the coordinates to T, X, and Y, such that:

[tex]dT = \sqrt{-f(t)} dt[/tex]
[tex]dX = \sqrt{g(x)} dx[/tex]
[tex]dY = \sqrt{H(y)} dy[/tex]

In these coordinates, the line element becomes:
[tex]ds^2 = - dT^2 + dX^2 + dY^2[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K