Metric of Manifold with Curled up Dimensions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical representation of a metric on a manifold that includes both macroscopic dimensions and microscopic "curled up" dimensions. Participants explore the implications of such a metric in the context of Riemannian manifolds and the relationship between local and global properties of the space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests an example of a metric on a manifold with curled up dimensions, expressing curiosity about its mathematical form.
  • Another participant explains that a metric is locally defined and suggests that the curling of dimensions is a global property not reflected in the local metric, although they acknowledge their limited understanding of the topic.
  • A different participant challenges the idea that curling dimensions do not appear in the metric tensor, proposing that they would manifest as a direct product between a normal manifold and the extra dimensions.
  • One participant provides an example of a metric for an infinitely long cylinder with a small radius, detailing the mathematical formulation and the resulting metric tensor.
  • The same participant notes that curled up dimensions can be incorporated into any metric tensor by adding small diagonal values, suggesting a method for representing such dimensions mathematically.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between local metrics and global properties of curled up dimensions. There is no consensus on how these dimensions should be represented in the metric tensor, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the topic and the potential for varying interpretations of how curled up dimensions interact with the metric structure of a manifold. Some assumptions about the nature of these dimensions and their mathematical representation remain unresolved.

Markus Hanke
Messages
259
Reaction score
45
Would someone here be able to write down for me an example of a metric on a manifold with both macroscopic dimensions, and microscopic "curled up" dimensions with some radius R ? Number of dimensions and coordinates used don't matter.

Not going anywhere with this, I am just curious as to how such a metric could look like, mathematically.

Thanks in advance !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A metric is a locally-defined structure--that is, when defining one, we may consider regions as small as we like. So if one dimension is curled up into a circle of radius R, we could define our metric on balls of radius R/100000 for instance. At that scale, we can't even detect the curling.

The "curling-up" of dimensions is a global property of the space, and so (at least in the category of Riemannian manifolds) it is not reflected by the metric, which is local. There are geometric structures you can put on a manifold that, I think, do force a connection between the global and local structures. But I'm only starting to learn about that, so I'll let someone else jump in and say whether that's the right way to think about it.
 
Tinyboss said:
The "curling-up" of dimensions is a global property of the space, and so (at least in the category of Riemannian manifolds) it is not reflected by the metric, which is local.

I am not an expert in this ( which is why I asked the question in the first place ), but somehow that statement does not appear to make sense. My thinking is that the extra dimension(s) would be a direct product between some "normal" manifold and the extra one, in which case they must appear in the metric tensor in some form.
 
Last edited:
The simplest example would be an infinitely long cylinder with a very small radius.
Take the axis of the cylinder to be the x-axis, the radius R, and \theta the angle a line, pependicular to the axis, from the axis to a point on the cylinder makes with the z-axis. Then we can write (x, y, z)= (x, R cos(\theta), R sin(\theta)).

Then dy= -Rsin(\theta)d\theta and dz= Rcos(\theta)d\theta and then ds^2= dx^2+ dy^2+ dz^2= dx^2+ R^2cos^2(\theta)d\theta+ R^2sin^2(\theta)d\theta= dx^2+ R^2d\theta^2.
The metric tensor is
\begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 \\ 0 & R^2\end{bmatrix}
and the "curling up" will be for R very small.

More generally, given any metric tensor, you can "add" curled up dimensions by adding rows and columns with all 0s except that the values on the diagonal are very small numbers- almost 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K