Metric Tensor of a line element

In summary, a tensor is a multi-linear form that maps vectors to real numbers, and in the case of Minkowski space, the tensor of second rank is defined as a symmetric bilinear form. The components of this tensor can be represented by the matrix g_mu_nu, which is invertible and has a fixed number of positive and negative eigenvalues. By choosing a pseudoorthonormal basis, the components of the metric tensor can be simplified to the form of the diagonal matrix with elements (1,-1,-1,-1). The derivation of the proper time for a massive particle in Minkowski space involves using the metric tensor to calculate the squared length of an infinitesimal line element. This concept can be applied to any two
  • #1
Tony Stark
51
2
When we define line element of Minkowski space, we also define the metric tensor of the equation. What actually is the function of the tensor with the line element.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A tensor is a multi-linear form, i.e., a function that maps ##n## vectors ##\vec{v}_j##, ##j \in \{1,2,3,\ldots,n \}## to real (I assume a real vector space here as is the case for Minkowski space) numbers, which is linear in each argument, i.e., for any numbers ##\lambda_1## and ##\lambda_2## you have
$$T(\lambda_1 \vec{x}+\lambda_2 \vec{y},\vec{x}_2,\ldots,\vec{x}_n)=\lambda_1 T(\vec{x},\vec{x}_2,\ldots,\vec{x}_n)+\lambda_2 T(\vec{y},\vec{x}_2,\ldots,\vec{x}_n)$$
and analogous rules for all the other arguments. Such a multi-linear form is called a tensor of ##n^{\text{th}}## rank.

In the case of Minkowski space you have a four-dimensional real vector space with a pseudometric, i.e., one has a nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form, i.e., a tensor of second rank. Usually it's written as ##x \cdot y##, where ##x## and ##y## are four-vectors (without an arrow; vectors with an arrow usually means the three spatial components in a given basis). The bilinear form is assumed to be symmetric, i.e., the so defined pseudoscalar product is commutative: ##x \cdot y=y \cdot x##.

Given a basis ##e_{\mu}## you have ##x=x^{\mu} e_{\mu}## and ##y=y^{\mu} e_{\mu}##, where the Einstein summation convention is used, i.e., whenever there is a pair of indices (one subscript one superscript) one has to sum over it. The indices usually run from 0 to 3. Now obviously due to the linear properties oft the pseudometric tensor it is sufficient to know the numbers
$$g_{\mu \nu} = e_{\mu} \cdot e_{\nu}$$
because then you have
$$x \dot y=x^{\mu} e_{\mu} \cdot y^{\nu} e_{\nu}=x^{\mu} y^{\mu} e_{\mu} \cdot e_{\nu}=x^{\mu} y^{\nu} g_{\mu \nu}.$$
The bilinear form is called non-degenerate if the ##4 \times 4##-matrix ##(g_{\mu \nu})## is invertible. There's also a theorem telling that this matrix has always the same number of positive and negative eigenvalues, no matter how you choose the basis. Minkowski space is defined as a space, where the components of the pseudometric form a matrix that has one positive and three negative eigenvector (or the other way around, depending on which sign convention you use; I'm using the socalled "west-coast convention").

Further one can show that there are always pseudoorthonormal bases, i.e., one can choose 4 vectors ##e_{\mu}## such that
$$(g_{\mu \nu}=(\eta_{\mu \nu})=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1).$$

Since ##g_{\mu \nu}## is invertible, it makes sense to define vector components with lower indices by
$$x_{\mu}=g_{\mu \nu} x^{\nu}.$$
Defining ##(g^{\mu \nu})=(g_{\mu \nu})^{-1}##, you get the inverse of this as
$$x^{\mu}=g^{\mu \nu} x_{\nu}.$$
Note that due to the symmetry of the pseudometric the matrices ##(g_{\mu \nu})## and ##g^{\mu \nu}## are symmetric.

Now if you have a trajectory in Minkowski space, a world line, given by a parametrization ##x=x(\lambda)## or for the components with respect to some fixed basis ##x^{\mu} =x^{\mu}(\lambda)##, the derivative ##\mathrm{d}x/\mathrm{d}\lambda=\dot{x}## are tangent vectors along this world line, and you can define the invariant (scalar) quantity
$$\mathrm{d} s^2=\mathrm{d} \lambda^2 \dot{x} \cdot \dot{x}=\mathrm{d} \lambda^2 g_{\mu \nu} \dot{x}^{\mu} \dot{x}^{\nu}.$$

If the world line describes the motion of a massive particle, then its tangent vectors are all time-like, i.e., ##\mathrm{d} s^2>0## at all points of the trajectory, and then it makes sense to define the proper time of the particle by
$$c \tau=\int_{\lambda_0}^{\lambda} \mathrm{d} \lambda ' \sqrt{\dot{x} \cdot \dot{x}}.$$
For a particle at rest in a given pseudoorthonormal coordinate system (Galilean basis), one has ##\vec{x}=\text{const}##, where ##\vec{x}## are the spatial components ##(x^1,x^2,x^3)## with respect to this Galilean basis, you have
$$c \tau=\int_{\lambda_0}^{\lambda} \mathrm{d} \lambda' \dot{x}^0=x^0(\lambda)-x^0(\lambda_0),$$
i.e., up to a conventional factor ##c## (speed of light in vacuum) the proper time of a massive particle is the time measured by a clock comoving with the particle.
 
  • Like
Likes Tony Stark
  • #3
The expression for the squared length of an infinitesimal line element (##ds^2=...##) is the result of applying the metric tensor, so you can read off the components of the metric tensor in a given coordinate system from the line element.

For example, we know that the line element in two-dimensional Euclidean space using Cartesian coordinates is ##ds^2=dx^2+dy^2##. We compare that with the general expression for the length of an infinitesimal line element in any two-dimensional space ##ds^2=g_{ij}x^ix^j=g_{00}dx_0^2+g_{01}dx_0dx_1+g_{10}dx_1dx_0+g_{11}dx_1^2## and we see that the components of the Euclidian-space metric tensor in these coordinates are ##g_{00}=g_{11}=1## and the rest are zero.

Usually writing down the line element is the most natural and compact way of specifying the components of the metric tensor. This works everywhere, not just in Minkowski space, so you'll see people writing ##ds^2=...## a lot.

And once you have the metric tensor, you know pretty much all there is to know about the space: curvature, geodesic equation, Christoffel symbols, Riemann, Ricci, Weyl tensors... They're all defined in terms of the metric tensor.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Tony Stark

What is the metric tensor of a line element?

The metric tensor of a line element is a mathematical quantity that describes the length and angles of curves in a given space. It is used in the study of differential geometry and plays a crucial role in general relativity.

How is the metric tensor of a line element defined?

The metric tensor of a line element is defined as a symmetric, positive definite matrix of coefficients that relate the infinitesimal change in distance between two nearby points to the infinitesimal change in their coordinates. It is denoted by gij.

What is the significance of the metric tensor of a line element?

The metric tensor of a line element is a fundamental quantity in the study of curved spaces and is essential in the formulation of Einstein's theory of general relativity. It allows us to define notions of distance, angles, and curvature in a given space.

How is the metric tensor of a line element calculated?

The metric tensor of a line element can be calculated using the line element equation, which relates the metric tensor to the coefficients of the space's metric tensor. Alternatively, it can also be calculated using the inner product of tangent vectors or by solving a set of differential equations.

What are some applications of the metric tensor of a line element?

The metric tensor of a line element is used in various fields, including physics, engineering, and mathematics. It is used to study the properties of curved spaces, to define notions of distance and angles in non-Euclidean spaces, and to formulate theories of gravity and relativity.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
907
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
869
Back
Top