Micrometeorite caught on camera in Oklahoma?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mp3car
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Camera
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a video capturing a flying object in Oklahoma, with participants questioning its classification as a meteor. Key points include the distinction between meteors and meteorites, with meteors burning up at altitudes above 50 km. Participants, including Dave, suggest that the object may be a lens flare rather than a meteor, supported by the observation that most meteors cease to glow before descending below 5 km. The credibility of local professors claiming it was a meteor is also challenged due to their limited expertise in the field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of meteor and meteorite definitions
  • Knowledge of atmospheric physics related to meteors
  • Familiarity with lens flare phenomena in video capture
  • Basic principles of light reflection and refraction
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between meteors and meteorites
  • Learn about atmospheric entry and the behavior of meteors
  • Investigate lens flare effects in photography and videography
  • Explore credible sources on meteor studies and expert qualifications
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, videographers, and anyone interested in meteor phenomena and atmospheric science.

mp3car
Messages
82
Reaction score
7
http://www.koco.com/news/flying-object-caught-on-koco-5-news-in-the-morning/31751658
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
hi
interesting video

firstly, just for your info ... a meteorite is only that after it has hit the ground, whilst in flight, its still a meteor

secondly ... don't know if you could call this a meteor. Meteors are not known for glowing all the way to the ground unless they are really massive
the "burning up" phase for all others takes place high in the atmosphere, 50 ++ km

I really don't know what has been captured there on video, but I seriously doubt that it was a meteor

Dave
 
The lens flare explanation in the comments there looks very reasonable. Some moving light source somewhere else got seen by the camera.

The motion does not fit to a meteor.
 
I later found a video where two local professors claimed it was likely a meteor... HOWEVER, those professors are not very well accredited to be weighing in on this subject; one holds a BS in Meteorology (ironically, doesn't make them an expert on meteors, despite the name), and the other one appears to have only taught 1000 and 2000 level math courses like college algebra and calc I...

I found this, which agrees exactly with what Dave said... "All but the largest meteors (like the one that formed Meteor Crater) quit burning and fall dark from an altitude of from 5 to 20 km (3.2 to 12.4 miles)." So... Even choosing the low end, this "appeared" to get much closer to the ground than 5km before going dark.
Item number 48A on http://meteorites.wustl.edu/realities.htm which links to: http://www.meteoritemarket.com/metid2.htm

Perhaps I'll reach out to a PhD-level astrophysicist at a reputable university, but probably shouldn't waste their time, I think you guys are right - it most likely was a lens flare/reflection of some kind...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K