Millikan's Oil-Drop Experiment: Is my reasoning correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mason Smith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying the reasoning behind the equation ε = (2mg)/q for the electric field needed to balance the forces on an oil drop. The user outlines their approach by first analyzing the forces acting on the drop when the electric field is off, establishing that buoyant force equals gravitational force at terminal velocity. They then consider the scenario with the electric field on, equating the forces to derive the electric field strength. A key point raised is the distinction between buoyancy and drag forces, emphasizing the need for symmetry in the analysis of upward and downward motion. Overall, the reasoning presented is critically evaluated for correctness in the context of the problem.
Mason Smith
Messages
21
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Show that the electric field needed to make the rise time of the oil drop equal to the its field free time is
ε = (2mg)/q

Homework Equations


Newton's second law F = ma
The force of gravity FG = mg, where g = 9.8 ms-2
The force of buoyancy Fb = bv
The force of an electric field on a charge ε = F/q, where ε = the strength of the electric field and q = the charge of the particle

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I added the forces for the oil drop falling when the electric field is "off." I added the buoyant force that results from terminal velocity and the force of gravity.
F = ma = 0 = bv - mg = 0 [1]
This can be rearranged to
bv = mg [2]

Second, I reasoned that when the electric field is "on," the sum of the forces must be
F = ma = εq - mg = mg [3]
I rewrote this as
ε = (2mg)/q

Was my approach correct for solving this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "force from the velocity" is not related to buoyancy, it is just drag. If you take it into account for the downwards motion you should also do it for the upwards motion to keep the symmetry.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K