Min Friction Factor to Maintain Angle of Beam on Wall: 60°

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a homogenous beam resting against a smooth wall at an angle of 60 degrees with the ground, with a mass resting on it. The objective is to determine the minimal friction factor required to maintain the beam's position without movement.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need for the total moment to be zero and question the identification of the center of mass. There are inquiries about the definitions and equations related to momentum and torque. Some participants suggest drawing a free-body diagram to identify forces acting on the beam.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts of static equilibrium and the forces involved. Some participants have provided guidance on identifying forces and conditions for static equilibrium, while others are still clarifying their understanding of terminology and concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention difficulties with terminology and the need for clarity in the equations used. There is a reference to past problems that may have provided clearer points for calculating torque, which is not as apparent in this scenario.

Patrikp
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Homogenous beam rests on smooth wall such that it forms an angle of 60 degrees with the ground (picture is rotated). A body of mass m = 60 kg rests 7 m from the end of beam which lies on ground. Mass of beam equals 15kg and length equals 10 m.
What is the minimal friction factor such that beam remains in same position?[/B]

Homework Equations


Torque = Force x distance

The Attempt at a Solution


I guess that total moment needs to be 0 but I can't go further then that. Also I don't know what the center should be. I know that the forces are gravitational of body, beam, and friction of beam and ground.[/B]
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    29.6 KB · Views: 500
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have messed up your terminology and equations..

What are the units for momentum? Force? Distance? What is the equation for work? What is the equation for torque?

Do objects with zero velocity have momentum?
If you want to find static equilibrium (ie case when it does not move) is momentum relevant?
 
Momentum = Force x distance
... this is not correct.
Perhaps you are thinking of the "moment"? Momentum is velocity times mass.

There are two conditions for a system to be static. One is that the sum of the moments must be zero. What is the other one?
Have you identified the forces on the beam? Have you drawn a sketch with the forces, labelled, drawn on it?
 
Simon Bridge said:
... this is not correct.
Perhaps you are thinking of the "moment"? Momentum is velocity times mass.

There are two conditions for a system to be static. One is that the sum of the moments must be zero. What is the other one?
Have you identified the forces on the beam? Have you drawn a sketch with the forces, labelled, drawn on it?

billy_joule said:
You have messed up your terminology and equations..

What are the units for momentum? Force? Distance? What is the equation for work? What is the equation for torque?

Do objects with zero velocity have momentum?
If you want to find static equilibrium (ie case when it does not move) is momentum relevant?

Ahh...I have problems translating it in English, I understand it. Anyways I thought of force x distance whatever it is called. I will edit it now.
 
Ok, I know that net torque of all forces and net force must be zero.
I draw the following forces:
1)gravitational force of beam (located in the middle of beam)
2)gravitational force of body ( exactly where the body is)
3) friction (acts horizontally?)

Then, I tried to write these forces as components of which some are parallel to beam and those which are forming right angle with beam.

But I think that problem for me is that in past problems I've done I have always had some point that was static and it was easy to calculate torque. Now I don't see that point or what?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K