Minimal angle of deviation through the prism

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the minimal angle of deviation (δm) of light passing through a prism, which is related to the index of refraction (n) and the inner angle of the prism (Φ). Participants are exploring how to express δ as a function of n and Φ, given their measured values and uncertainties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the angle of deviation and the prism's properties, attempting to derive δ using trigonometric functions. Questions arise about alternative methods and the implications of rounding results in the context of significant figures.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered hints and suggested formulas for expressing δ in terms of n and Φ. There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to the problem, with some participants expressing uncertainty about rounding and error propagation in their results.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the independent nature of the variables n and Φ, and there is mention of error bars associated with these measurements, which may influence the calculations of δ.

diracdelta
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Minimal angle of deviation δm of light after passing through prism is connected with index of refraction n and inner angle of prism Φ:

7D%7B2%7D%5C%20%28%5Cphi%20+%20%5Cdelta%20_%7Bm%7D%29%7D%7Bsin%5Cfrac%7B%5Cphi%7D%7B2%7D%7D.gif


If index of refraction and inner angle of prism are directly measured, determine minimal angle of deviation,
n=(1.52 ± 0.04)
Φ=(30 ± 0.02)°

The Attempt at a Solution


When having dependent variables, we use formulae x=F(a,b,c,...)

x(medium) =F(a(medium), b(medium),...)
plus forumulae for uncertainty.

My question here is, how to express delta as a function of phi and n?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, n * sin ( phi ) = sin 1/2 ( phi + delta )
arcsin (n* sin (phi) = 1/2 ( phi + delta )
2 * arcsin ( n* sin(phi))= ( phi + delta )
=> delta = 2*arcsin (n*sin (phi )) - phi

idem there other way?
i assume this one is correct tho
 
diracdelta said:
well, n * sin ( phi ) = sin 1/2 ( phi + delta )
arcsin (n* sin (phi) = 1/2 ( phi + delta )
2 * arcsin ( n* sin(phi))= ( phi + delta )
=> delta = 2*arcsin (n*sin (phi )) - phi

idem there other way?
i assume this one is correct tho
That's the way!
 
one more question.
i got result in a problem i.e.
x= 43.84
Mx = 0.01559

now, when i round it to one significant is this correct;

Mx= 0.02
x= 43

x = (43 +- 0.02)
 
or x = 40
 
diracdelta said:
one more question.
i got result in a problem i.e.
x= 43.84
Mx = 0.01559

now, when i round it to one significant is this correct;

Mx= 0.02
x= 43

x = (43 +- 0.02)
Not sure I can answer that question. I would have said x = 43.84 +/- 0.02 but I don't know the background.

OK, I didn't see the error bars on φ. and n. I thought you just wanted nominal δm.

Realize that φ and n are independent variables. δ depends on the material's n and on the prism angle φ.
So you need dδ as a function of dφ and dn. What would that be? (Hint: dδ is an "exact differential" of φ and n.)
 
I appreciate your help, but i solved it, the rest, by myself. thanks. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K