Minimization of objective function

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
kiuhnm
Messages
66
Reaction score
1
Hi,
I need to minimize, with respect to [itex]\hat{y}(x)[/itex], the following function:
[tex]\tilde{J}_x = \mathbb{E}_{p(x,y)}[(\hat{y}(x)-y)^2] + \nu \mathbb{E}_{p(x,y)}[(\hat{y}(x)-y)tr(\nabla_x^2\hat{y}(x))] + \nu \mathbb{E}_{p(x,y)}[||\nabla_x\hat{y}(x)||^2],[/tex]
where [itex]x[/itex] is a vector and [itex]y[/itex] a scalar.
I found this in a book about Deep Learning (Machine Learning). I'm studying on my own and this math is a bit over my head. If you want more context, see pages 215-216 here: http://goodfeli.github.io/dlbook/contents/regularization.html
First of all, do I need to learn the Calculus of Variations to solve this?
The expression I wrote here is slightly different from the one on the book, because I think the authors forgot a "trace" (tr).
Thank you for your time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey,
I think you're looking for the Lagrange multiplier

MP

EDIT: Sorry, misread the post, I thought you already wanted a solution within calculus. The answer to whether or not you'll have to learn it is not really, as you will have a machine do it for you anyway. So you don't have to understand why this solution works as long as you manage to code it once / get somebody else to do it.
 
And please don't forget that the function doesn't neccesarily have to obtain a min/max value, unless you're working with a closed set.

For example the function f(x) = x obtains no minima/maxima for x∈(0,1), although you can get "infinitely close" to both infimum and supremum (0 and 1). You may have to consider these cases separately, that really depends on what you're doing.

MP