Minimizing the distance between two points and a line

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Points
Click For Summary
To find the point P on line l that maximizes |AP - PB|, the intersection of line l and line ℓ_AB (the line through points A and B) is the solution when they are not parallel. In the case where l and ℓ_AB are parallel, |AP - PB| becomes unbounded as P moves along l, indicating no maximum exists. The discussion suggests using squared distances for easier calculations, although this approach may not directly apply to the problem. A potential solution could involve trigonometric functions or the law of cosines to derive a more manageable function. Overall, the problem requires careful consideration of the geometric relationships between the points and lines involved.
Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


Let ##A## and ##B## be two given points, ##l## a given line. Find the point ##P## on ##l## such that ##|AP-PB|## is a maximum.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Suppose that the line ##l## and the line that goes through ##A## and ##B## (call it ##\ell_{AB}##) are not parallel. Then our desired point ##P## is the the intersection of ##l## and ##\ell_{AB}##. Is this correct? I'm pretty sure it is.

But what about when ##l## and ##\ell_{AB}## are parallel? There doesn't seem to be a maximum, since if you move a point ##P## along any direction of the line we'll just get greater and greater values for ##|AP-PB|##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your intuition is correct, in which case you'd just note that in the parallel case ##|AP - PB|## is unbounded above.

But you should solve this analytically, maximizing by the usual methods. One hint: When working with distances, it will usually make your life a heck of a lot easier to work with the squared distance. rather than the absolute value. It's differentiable everywhere (no corner points) and the form of the derivatives is a lot simpler.

So set up the expression for ##|AP - PB|^2## and apply the standard methods.

Edit: I misread this problem. My general comments about using distance squared and avoiding square roots still stands, but at first glance I'm not sure if it's applicable to this problem. The general idea is to get a nicer function which is minimized / maximized when your original function is minimized / maximized, but simply squaring isn't going to do it here.

More Edit: My hunch is that the "nicer function" would be something involving trig functions, perhaps invoking the law of cosines in some way. Indeed, it may be the triangles involved that led you to your intuition on the nature of the solution.
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K