Minimum Kinetic Energy of a Proton Confined in a Uranium Nucleus

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the minimum kinetic energy of a proton confined within a uranium nucleus, specifically with a radius of 8 x 10^-15 m. Participants clarify that the length (L) used in the uncertainty principle should be the diameter of the nucleus, not the radius. The confusion arises from the interpretation of delta-x, which is defined as L/2, leading to discrepancies in the kinetic energy equation. Ultimately, the correct interpretation of L is crucial for accurate calculations in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of nuclear physics, specifically uranium nucleus properties
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical manipulation of physical equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in detail
  • Learn about quantum confinement and its implications in nuclear physics
  • Explore kinetic energy calculations for particles in potential wells
  • Investigate the properties of uranium nuclei and their implications in nuclear reactions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and nuclear physics, will benefit from this discussion, as it addresses fundamental concepts related to particle confinement and energy calculations.

Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
36. A proton is confined in a uranium nucleus of radius 8 x 10^-15 m. Determine the proton's minimum kinetic energy according to the uncertainty principle if the proton is confined to a one-dimensional box that has length equal to the nuclear diameter.

What's wrong with my equation and value I used for L^2?

362.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You defined L = 2\Delta x so that means L should be the diameter and not the radius of the nucleus.
 
nickjer said:
You defined L = 2\Delta x so that means L should be the diameter and not the radius of the nucleus.

Son of a... It does say diameter. :rolleyes: And so delta-x is the radius.

Where did the 8 come from?
 
Last edited:
I think the 8 came from if you pulled the 2 from 2*r out of the square it would be 4. And then you would have 2*4 = 8.
 
But the 1.6 x 10^-5 nm = 2r, so that term is already squared. She has 8*m*d^2, not 2*m*(2r)^2 which would be 8*m*r^2.

The definition of delta-x is arbitrary, right? But it has to make sense in the context of the wave function. It seems that delta-x = L/2 is a common definition.
 
Last edited:
I think your grader just corrected it twice. Not thinking that you would interpret at as a single correction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
16K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
3K