Minkowski diagram - the angle between axes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the angle between the axes of two inertial frames in special relativity, specifically using the rapidity function and Lorentz transformations. The user initially attempted to derive the angle using the transformation equations for rapidity but faced difficulties. Ultimately, they successfully solved the problem using standard Lorentz transformations, confirming that the angle is given by tan^-1(v/c). The confusion arose from the application of the rapidity function and its relationship to Lorentz boosts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, particularly Lorentz transformations
  • Familiarity with rapidity and its mathematical representation
  • Knowledge of hyperbolic functions, specifically tanh and its inverse
  • Basic grasp of inertial frames and their properties in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Learn about the rapidity function and its applications in special relativity
  • Explore hyperbolic functions and their geometric interpretations
  • Investigate the concept of inertial frames and their significance in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying special relativity, educators teaching these concepts, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of relativistic transformations.

3nTr0pY
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I was reading through my textbook and it said that the angle between the axes of two inertial frames, one stationary and one moving at velocity v is supposed to be tan^-1(v/c). I assumed this would be easy to show, but after spending a couple of hours on this probably trivial problem, I can't for the life of me get the right answer.

I'm using the transformation:

ct' = ctcosh(a) -xsinh(a)
x' = -ctsinh(a) + xcosh(a)
y' = y
z' = z

where a is the 'rapidity function', tanh^-1(v/c) (not that I really understand what that is)

What I've done is choose a value of ct' and kept x' = 0 i.e. (0, ct'), because I'm supposed to be looking at the axes. I'm supposed to convert this into the other inertial frame, I think, but I'm really confused...

Anyone know the answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I solved it using bog standard Lorentz transformations. As (annoyingly) easy as that.But I'm still really confused as to why I couldn't get the transformation I mentioned in my first post to work (the Lorentz boost). I don't really get how it works/what the point of it is, so any clarification on that would be helpful.
 
The x' axis is where t'=0. So set t'=0 and solve for the slope of this line, ct/x, and I think you'll get the answer you're looking for.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
795
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K