How Is Object Distance Calculated in Mirror and Lens Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikil100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lenses Mirrors
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating object distance in mirror and lens equations, specifically for a concave mirror with a radius of 39 cm and an object height of 0.6 cm, resulting in an image height of 0.2 cm. The focal point is determined to be 19.5 cm, leading to equations involving object distance (Do) and image distance (Di). The calculations reveal that the object distance is -39 cm, suggesting the object is at the center of the sphere, which raises questions about the sign convention used. When applying the same principles to a convex mirror, the calculations yield a positive object distance, indicating a difference in sign usage between the two types of mirrors. The negative sign in the equations is attributed to the nature of the image being real and inverted for the concave mirror.
mikil100
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In front of a spherical concave mirror of radius 39cm, you position and object of height 0.6cm somewhere along the principal axis. The resultant image has a height of 0.2cm, How far from the mirror is the object located?
What if this were a convex mirror with the same radius, and the same image and object height?

Homework Equations



1/f=1/Di+1/Do

M=Hi/Ho= -Di/Do

F=1/2R

The Attempt at a Solution



1/2R=19.5cm focal point

I have two equations with two unknowns (Di and Do). I used the equation Hi/Ho=-Di/Do to solve the equation for -Di, getting 0.2/0.6= 1/3. 1/3=-Di/Do, solving for Di I get -1/3Do=Di.

I then just plug this equation into the mirror equation

1/do+1/(-1/3do)=1/f... I bring the -3 from the denominator into the numerator

1/f is 2/39

1/d0-3/do=2/39

-2/do=2/39
do=-39cm

I follow the same process for a convex mirror but I get a positive answer with the same value of 39. I don't think a negative answer makes sense, and I am unsure of my sign usage... I find it odd that my object distance is the same as my mirrors radius.

Thank you in advance for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mikil100 said:
1/do+1/(-1/3do)=1/f
Where does the minus sign come from?

mikil100 said:
do=-39cm
This would mean the object is right in the center of the sphere (or on the wrong side, depending on the sign convention). Can that be true?
 
mikil100 said:

Homework Equations



1/f=1/Di+1/Do

M=Hi/Ho= -Di/Do

F=1/2R

The Attempt at a Solution



1/2R=19.5cm focal point

I have two equations with two unknowns (Di and Do). I used the equation Hi/Ho=-Di/Do to solve the equation for -Di, getting 0.2/0.6= 1/3. 1/3=-Di/Do,

The image is smaller than the object. In case of a concave mirror, that means real image, which is upside-down, so Hi is negative, and Hi/Ho = -1/3 = -Di/Do.
 
mfb said:
Where does the minus sign come from?

This would mean the object is right in the center of the sphere (or on the wrong side, depending on the sign convention). Can that be true?

Hi, thank you for the reply.

The negative sign in 1/(-1/3Do) is from this equation M=Hi/Ho= -Di/Do

Where Di is negative, getting Di on its own I have 0.2/0.6=-Di/Do----> 1/3*Do=-Di multiply both sides by -1 to get -1/3Do=Di

I then plugged the negative 1/3Do into 1/Di in the mirror equation. This negative sign is what is really tripping me up actually. When I do the same with the convex lense I get the same answer but the sign is switched in the final answer.

If the there was no negative # in 1/(1/3Do) then I will get 4/Do=1/F, which equals 78cm.
 
.
mikil100 said:
The negative sign in 1/(-1/3Do) is from this equation M=Hi/Ho= -Di/Do

Read my Post #3 . Hi is negative as it is an upside-down image.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
938
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
995
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K