Missing something (Newtons law)

  • Thread starter Thread starter pinsky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Newtons law
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying Newton's laws to a system involving multiple masses (M, m1, and m2) and determining the force required to keep m1 and m2 stationary relative to M. The problem context includes considerations of frictionless surfaces and the influence of a pulley system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to solve the problem using two different approaches, leading to different expressions for the force. They question the role of m1 in their calculations and seek clarification on the forces acting on the system.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's reasoning, with some providing insights into the role of the pulley and the forces involved. There is a recognition of the need to consider all masses in the force calculations, and the discussion is moving towards a clearer understanding of the system dynamics.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions regarding the forces acting on the masses, particularly the influence of the pulley and the interactions between the masses. The original poster expresses confusion about the contributions of each mass to the overall force required.

pinsky
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
attachment.php?attachmentid=29661&stc=1&d=1289048285.gif


Hello there!

I'm trying to solve this in two ways, and i keep getting different solutions. I need to find the force by which M should be pushed for m1 and m2 stand still (compared tom M). There is no friction between anything.

First solution:
F_{rp} = m_2 \cdot g \: \: \: F_{rp} = m_1 \cdot a \: \: \Rightarrow a = \frac{m_2}{m_1} g <br />

<br /> F = (M + m_1 + m_2) \cdot a = (M + m_1 + m_2) \cdot \frac{m_2}{m_1} g<br />

So in this solution, I'v observed all the objects as a system, so that's how i got the F=m_total * a.


Second solution:

F_{rp} = m_2 \cdot g \\\\\\\ F_{rp} = m_1 \cdot a \: \: \Rightarrow a = \frac{m_2}{m_1} g

<br /> m_2 \cdot a = F_p

<br /> F - F_p = a \cdot M \: \: \Rightarrow F = a \cdot (M+m_2)<br />

I've done a step by step decomposition of all forces, but I'm missing the influence of m1.

What am I missing here?
 

Attachments

  • 3_31_zitnik.gif
    3_31_zitnik.gif
    5.6 KB · Views: 571
Physics news on Phys.org
for second solution:
F - Fp = a . ( M + m1)
Then the final answer will appear as F = (M + m1 + m2) . a
 
Why so?

If I'm observing the forces diagram for the mass M. There is not a force m1*a having an influence on it.

Could you explain please?
 
hi pinsky! :smile:

essentially, you're asking is F = (M + m1 + m2)a, or is it only F = (M + m2)a ?

you're thinking that there's no horizontal force between m1 (the top block) and M-plus-m2, the force F is pushing M and m2 but isn't pushing m1, and so why should m1 be included in the F = ma for M-plus-m2 ?

but you're ignoring the forces at the pulley … if the pulley was mounted on a spring, the rope would pull it diagonally down … basically, there's both a horizontal force and a vertical force at the pulley, each of strength Frp, and that horizontal force is an external force on M-plus-m2, making the M equation (F - Frp - Fp) = (M + m2)a :wink:
 
YES!

Thank you!

I've failed to see the pulley can be considered as a part of M, and that is how m1 influences M.

[SOLVED]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K