Mixing 2nd and 6th groups' elements to semiconductor silicon

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using 2nd and 6th group elements to create n-type and p-type semiconductors, traditionally made with 5th and 3rd group elements. Participants highlight that 6th group elements are likely to form double covalent bonds, which would not facilitate the creation of n-type silicon. Additionally, the use of 2nd group elements may lead to undesirable ionic bonds, resulting in charged states that could negatively affect the performance of transistors. Overall, the consensus is that mixing these elements with silicon or germanium would not yield effective semiconductors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of semiconductor physics
  • Knowledge of covalent and ionic bonding
  • Familiarity with n-type and p-type semiconductor concepts
  • Basic chemistry principles related to group elements
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of 5th and 3rd group elements in semiconductor applications
  • Explore the implications of covalent bonding in semiconductor materials
  • Study the effects of ionic bonding on semiconductor performance
  • Learn about the role of charge carriers in n-type and p-type semiconductors
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in materials science, semiconductor engineering, and chemistry, particularly those interested in semiconductor fabrication and electronic device performance.

PainterGuy
Messages
938
Reaction score
73
Hi everyone, :smile:

I was wondering why they only use 5th and 3rd groups elements to create n-type and p-type semiconductors respectively. Couldn't we mix 6th or 2nd groups' elements instead to make the semiconductors? What would happen if we do this? Perhaps elements of those groups will bind to the silicon or germanium atoms too strongly and there would not be free charges then. Many thanks for any help you can offer.

Cheers
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Chemistry's not my strong point (I prefer physics), but I know one for sure.

6th group elements would be more likely to form double covalent bonds rather than n-type silicon. An example, carbon dioxide. Carbon (4th period) bonds with two oxygen (6th period) with a pair of double covalent bonds to form CO2.

For 2nd period chemicals...ionic bonds, I think? Not too sure about that one.
 
My off the-cuff semi-educated guess would be that this is undesirable due to the fact that you'd end up with two charged states for acceptors and/or donors, +/-2, and +/-1. This probably has some sort of impact on how how smoothly, and how quickly logic level transitions occur (when making transistors).

Since semiconductor physics was a long time ago for me (and I don't have my textbook on my shelf), I've asked for this to be moved to the appropriate forum, and a mod may be by to do so.

EDIT: Unless someone remembers their semiconductor physics better than I do.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K