Mod(prime) is a field mod(non-prime) is not

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter General_Sax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical concept of whether the quotient ring Z/Zn forms a field, depending on whether n is a prime number or not. Participants explore the implications of n being prime and the conditions under which Z/Zn fails to be a field when n is composite.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that Z/Zn is a field if n is prime, using Fermat's little theorem to support their claim.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about demonstrating the lack of a multiplicative inverse in Z/Zn when n is not prime, referencing the condition gcd(a,n) = 1.
  • A third participant proposes a method to show that for non-prime n, there exist elements a and b in Z/Zn such that ab = 0 (mod n), indicating that these elements cannot be invertible.
  • This participant elaborates that if an inverse 1/a existed, it would lead to a contradiction, thus reinforcing the argument against the existence of inverses in the non-prime case.
  • The same participant notes that since n is not prime, there exists a divisor d such that 1 < d < n, leading to the conclusion that dk = n = 0 (mod n).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the assertion that Z/Zn is a field when n is prime. However, there is ongoing uncertainty and exploration regarding the non-prime case, with no consensus reached on the implications or the demonstration of the lack of inverses.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the properties of gcd and the implications of divisibility, which are not fully resolved. The exploration of multiplicative inverses relies on conditions that may not be universally applicable without further clarification.

General_Sax
Messages
445
Reaction score
0
Let n ≥ 2 be a natural number. Show that Z/Zn is a field if and only if n is a prime
number

Now, I can show that if n is prime then Z/Zn is a field

a = a
b = an-2

a*b = an-1 = 1 (mod n) --> Fermat's little theorem

However, I can't really seem to show that there is no multiplicative inverse for Z/Zn where n is not prime.

First question: a =/=b correct?

i know that there is the whole if gcd(a,n) = 1 then there is a multiplicative inverse, but I can't really see how to leverage this fact.

Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i know that there is the whole if gcd(a,n) = 1 then there is a multiplicative inverse, but I can't really see how to leverage this fact.

Not only that, but I don't truly understand why this is.
 
for non-prime n,

what you want to do is find a,b ≠ 0 in Z/Zn such that:

ab = 0 (mod n).

these elements cannot be invertible.

suppose 1/a existed. then:

(1/a)(ab) = [(1/a)(a)]b = 1b = b ≠ 0 (mod n)

BUT...

(1/a)(ab) = (1/a)0 = 0 (mod n), a contradiction.

(1/b) can be shown not to exist in a similar fashion (multiply on the right).

since n is not prime, there is some 1 < d < n with d|n.

so n = dk, where 1 < d,k < n.

thus d,k ≠ 0 (mod n) but dk = n = 0 (mod n).
 
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
901
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K