Modeling mathematically a rotary flexible beam

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on mathematically modeling the rotation of a rotary flexible beam, specifically one that is not fixed-free but has a counterweight to minimize motor current at rest. The user has conducted vibration tests revealing free-free beam behavior up to the third mode, but faces challenges in modeling higher modes due to unclear boundary conditions. The conversation suggests utilizing Finite Element Analysis (FEA) tools like ANSYS or COMSOL for modal analysis to better understand the beam's behavior and optimize the equation of motion developed for reducing free vibration at the tip post-rotation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotary flexible beam dynamics
  • Familiarity with modal analysis techniques
  • Knowledge of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) tools such as ANSYS or COMSOL
  • Basic principles of vibration testing and boundary conditions
NEXT STEPS
  • Conduct a modal analysis using ANSYS to identify mode shapes and frequencies
  • Explore COMSOL Multiphysics for simulating flexible beam behavior under various boundary conditions
  • Research generalized mass and mode participation factors in the context of beam dynamics
  • Investigate methods for reducing free vibration in flexible structures
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, researchers in structural dynamics, and anyone involved in the design and analysis of rotary flexible systems will benefit from this discussion.

Ben9622111222
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to mathematically model the rotation of a rotary flexible beam. There are numerous papers which study this topic but all of them are considering the beam as a fixed-free one. My case is different.
upload_2015-10-9_7-44-44.png

This is the beam I am trying to model. The motor axis is at the square portion towarsd the right end of the beam. The part marked in gold is the counter weight so that motor can be given low current when system is at rest.

I have tested the modes of vibration and found that it shows the nature of a free-free beam upto third mode, but for higher modes it was not clear. Only if I know how the beam behaves, can I go futher with the modeling.
upload_2015-10-9_7-50-16.png

Also one node was always at the motor axis position.
Can anyone suggest me how I should go forward to understand the beam model and mathematically model it.
Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Mech_Engineer said:
Have you considered doing a modal analysis using a Finite Element Analysis tool like ANSYS or COMSOL?
I have not done a modal analysis. Because the test setup already showed me the nature of vibration upto 12 modes and also the mode frequencies. My ultimate aim is to reduve the free vibration at the tip when it is stopped after a rotation. For this I have developed an equation of motionj. The problem is the terms generalized mass and mode participation factor depend on what boundary condition is selected. And this is dependent on the beam fixation.

So I am confused which boundary condition suits.

The attached figure shows a close approximation. Will this do?
 

Attachments

  • figure.png
    figure.png
    7.3 KB · Views: 458

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K