MHB Modules - Generating and Cogenerating Classes - Bland - Chapter 4, Section 4.1

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am trying to understand Chapter 4, Section 4.1 on generating and cogenerating classes and need help with the proof of Proposition 4.1.1.

Proposition 4.1.1 and its proof read as follows:

View attachment 3649
View attachment 3650

I need some help with what seems a fairly intuitive step in the logic of the proof of $$(3) \Longrightarrow (4)$$ - see text above.In the proof of $$(3) \Longrightarrow (4)$$ Bland writes:

" ... ... Thus, by (3) there is a finite set $$F \subseteq \Delta$$ and an epimorphism $$ \phi \ : \ R^{ ( F ) } \longrightarrow M$$.

If we let

$$F = \{ 1,2, \ ... \ ... \ ,n \}$$

and if

$$\{ e_i \}_{i =1}^n$$

is the canonical basis for the free $$R$$-module $$R^{ ( n ) }$$, then the finite set

$$X = \{ \phi (e_i) \}_{i =1}^n$$

will generate $$M$$. ... ... "My question is the following:

Why, exactly, if $$\{ e_i \}_{i =1}^n$$ is the canonical basis for the free $$R$$-module $$R^{ ( n ) }$$, are we guaranteed that $$X$$ will generate $$M$$? [this does seem intuitive - but why EXACTLY! ]I would really appreciate some help with this issue.Peter***EDIT***

I now have a second question:

In the above text, Bland writes:

" ... ... Every R-module is the homomorphic image of a free R-module, ... ... "

So if that is true, then we have a set $$\Delta$$ and a homomorphism $$R^{ ( \Delta ) } \longrightarrow M$$ ... ...

... ... BUT ... ... Bland claims we have an epimorphism $$R^{ ( \Delta ) } \longrightarrow M$$ ...

How do we know that we not only have a homomorphism, but that we have an epimorphism?

Hep will be appreciated ...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Take $m \in M$. Since $\phi : R^{(n)} \to M$ is surjective, there exists an $x \in R^{(n)}$ such that $\phi(x) = m$. Since $\{e_i\}_{i = 1}^n$ is the canonical basis for $R^{(n)}$, there are unique $R$-scalars $r_1,\ldots, r_n$ such that $x = \sum_{i = 1}^n r_i e_i$. Since $\phi$ is an $R$-homomorphism,

$$m = \phi(x) = \sum_{i = 1}^n r_i \phi(e_i).$$

As $m$ is arbitrary, this shows that $\{\phi(e_i)\}_{i = 1}^n$ generates $M$.
 
Euge said:
Take $m \in M$. Since $\phi : R^{(n)} \to M$ is surjective, there exists an $x \in R^{(n)}$ such that $\phi(x) = m$. Since $\{e_i\}_{i = 1}^n$ is the canonical basis for $R^{(n)}$, there are unique $R$-scalars $r_1,\ldots, r_n$ such that $x = \sum_{i = 1}^n r_i e_i$. Since $\phi$ is an $R$-homomorphism,

$$m = \phi(x) = \sum_{i = 1}^n r_i \phi(e_i).$$

As $m$ is arbitrary, this shows that $\{\phi(e_i)\}_{i = 1}^n$ generates $M$.
Thanks for your help, Euge ...

... much appreciated ...Can you please help with the second question ... ... as follows ... ...

In the above text, Bland writes:

" ... ... Every R-module is the homomorphic image of a free R-module, ... ... "

So if that is true, then we have a set Δ and a homomorphism $$R^{ ( \Delta ) } \longrightarrow M$$ ... ...

... ... BUT ... ... Bland claims we have an epimorphism $$R^{ ( \Delta ) } \longrightarrow M$$ ...

How do we know that we not only have a homomorphism, but that we have an epimorphism?

Hope you can help,

Peter
Peter
 
Last edited:
Since $M$ is the homomorphic image of a free $R$-module, $M = \phi(R^{(\Delta)})$ for some set $\Delta$ and some $R$-homomorphism $\phi$. This $\phi$ must then be an epimorphism from $R^{(\Delta)}$ onto $M$.
 
Euge said:
Since $M$ is the homomorphic image of a free $R$-module, $M = \phi(R^{(\Delta)})$ for some set $\Delta$ and some $R$-homomorphism $\phi$. This $\phi$ must then be an epimorphism from $R^{(\Delta)}$ onto $M$.

Thanks Euge ... most helpful ... as usual ...

Peter
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top