Modulus of elasticity, problem. Graph and table.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating Young's modulus of elasticity for 0.1% carbon steel using data from a tensile test. The participant attempted to compute the modulus using the formula E = σ/ε, where σ is stress and ε is strain. The calculated value was 27.96 x 109 Pa, significantly lower than the typical value of 207 x 109 Pa for the material. The participant acknowledged potential errors in their calculations, particularly regarding the original length of the wire.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensile testing and its parameters
  • Familiarity with Young's modulus and its significance in material science
  • Knowledge of stress and strain calculations
  • Basic proficiency in unit conversions (e.g., mm to m)
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of tensile testing and how to accurately measure stress and strain
  • Learn about the significance of Young's modulus in material selection and engineering applications
  • Study unit conversion techniques to ensure accuracy in calculations
  • Explore common errors in modulus calculations and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Material scientists, mechanical engineers, and students studying material properties who seek to understand the calculation of Young's modulus and improve their tensile testing methodologies.

MMCS
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
Attached is the graph and small part of table that i have chosen from the elastic range (first column extension, second column load) from a tensile test. I am trying to calculate youngs modulus of elasticity but can't seem to get a figure close to that of the common figure for the material

Material 0.1% carbon steel
Area = 20 x 10-6m2
Yield force = 6009N
Length increase at yield force = 0.537mm = 0.000537m
Original length = 50.mm = 0.05m


E = σ/ε

E = (6006/20x10-6) / (0.000537/0.05)
E = 27.96 x 109
Typical value = 207 x 109

Iv obviously went very wrong somewhere but i don't know where

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    43.4 KB · Views: 646
Physics news on Phys.org
For a start, send again but include the units at every step (as is good practice).
 
Are you certain that the original length of the wire was 50mm and not 50cm?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
88K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K