Modulus of the difference of two complex numbers

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the geometric relationship |z3 - z-3| = 2sin(3θ) for complex numbers expressed in polar form, specifically using the notation z = cis(θ) where 0 < θ < π/6. Participants explore various geometric interpretations and mathematical manipulations related to this expression.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in proving the relationship using geometry and mentions having plotted points on an Argand diagram.
  • Another participant suggests that the problem can be approached without using Argand diagrams, focusing instead on the definitions of cis and the properties of complex numbers.
  • A different participant describes solving the problem by constructing a rhombus and using right-angled triangles to find the lengths involved, specifically identifying that the vertical length corresponds to |z3 - z-3|.
  • Some participants discuss the algebraic manipulation of the expression z3 - z-3 and how it relates to sine and cosine functions, with one noting that this leads to a factor of i in their calculations.
  • There is a mention of the geometric interpretation of the modulus and how it relates to the angles formed by z3 and z-3.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various approaches to the problem, with no consensus on a single method or solution. Disagreements arise regarding the necessity of using geometric methods versus algebraic manipulation, and some participants question the correctness of their own interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations in their understanding of the cis notation and the geometric implications of their constructions. There is also uncertainty about the implications of specific angles chosen for z.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students learning about complex numbers, particularly those interested in geometric interpretations and the relationships between algebraic and geometric representations in the complex plane.

Fourthkind
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,
I've been trying to help a friend with something that I learned in class but I'm now finding it hard to solve myself. The problem goes as follows:

Use geometry to show that |z3-z-3| = 2sin3θ

For z=cisθ, 0<θ<∏/6

Now, I chose ∏/12 as my angle and plotted all this on an Argand diagram, but I don't know how to prove that |z3-z-3| = 2sin3θ in such general form. I know that it is right, but I don't know how to get there. Right now I have a isosceles triangle with two lengths known and two angles known (both 3θ). I know the triangle is right-angled but I don't know if I can use this information since that is specific to my chosen angle, right?

I've spent quite some time on it and I'd really like to understand it. So far I've got xsin3θ=1 where x = |z3-z-3|.

Please help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fourthkind said:
Hi guys,
I've been trying to help a friend with something that I learned in class but I'm now finding it hard to solve myself. The problem goes as follows:

Use geometry to show that |z3-z-3| = 2sin3θ

For z=cisθ, 0<θ<∏/6 if [itex]z= cis(\theta)[/itex] then [itex]z^3= cis(3\theta)[/itex] and [itex]z^{-3}= cis(-3\theta)[/tex][/itex]
[itex] Do you understand what "cis" means? This takes about one line from that. You don't need to do anything at all with "Argand diagrams". If z= cis(θ) then [itex]z^3= cis(3\theta)[/itex] and [itex]z^{-3}= cis(-3\theta)[/itex] so that [itex]z^3- z^{-3}= cis(3\theta)- cis(-3\theta)[/itex]. Write that out in terms of the <b>definition</b> of "ciz".<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> Now, I chose ∏/12 as my angle and plotted all this on an Argand diagram, but I don't know how to prove that |z<sup>3</sup>-z<sup>-3</sup>| = 2sin3θ in such general form. I know that it is right, but I don't know how to get there. Right now I have a isosceles triangle with two lengths known and two angles known (both 3θ). I know the triangle is right-angled but I don't know if I can use this information since that is specific to my chosen angle, right?<br /> <br /> I've spent quite some time on it and I'd really like to understand it. So far I've got xsin3θ=1 where x = |z<sup>3</sup>-z<sup>-3</sup>|.<br /> <br /> Please help! </div> </div> </blockquote>[/itex]
 
HallsofIvy said:
Do you understand what "cis" means? This takes about one line from that. You don't need to do anything at all with "Argand diagrams". If z= cis(θ) then [itex]z^3= cis(3\theta)[/itex] and [itex]z^{-3}= cis(-3\theta)[/itex] so that [itex]z^3- z^{-3}= cis(3\theta)- cis(-3\theta)[/itex]. Write that out in terms of the definition of "ciz".

Could you explain this a little more?

I managed to solve it by drawing a rhombus with |[itex]z^3- z^{-3}[/itex]|being the vertical length along the imaginary axis from the origin to the point [itex]z^3- z^{-3}[/itex] (by definition) then drawing a perpendicular bisector (that is, parallel to the real axis) which created four right-angled triangles with their 90° angles joined to the midpoint between the origin and point [itex]z^3- z^{-3}[/itex]. Using one of these triangles, I determined the length of OM was [itex]sin3θ[/itex] and therefore O to [itex]z^3- z^{-3}[/itex] was twice that since M is the midpoint. I solved it like this since the problem stated it needed to be solved using geometry specifically.

I'll attach a picture to show you what I mean. It doesn't show in it but, line OA is equal in length to [itex]z^{3}[/itex]
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0217.jpg
    IMAG0217.jpg
    20.7 KB · Views: 522
You didn't say "the problem stated it needed to be solved using geometry specifically"!

My idea was [itex]z^3- z^{-3}= cis(3\theta)- cis(-3\theta)= cos(3\theta)+ sin(3\theta)- (cos(-3\theta)+ sin(-3\theta)[/itex][itex]= cos(3\theta)+ sin(3\theta)- cos(3\theta)+ sin(3\theta)= 2sin(3\theta)[/itex].
 
Fourthkind said:
Use geometry to show that |z3-z-3| = 2sin3θ

So I assumed I had to do it in a way similar to the way I did.

HallsofIvy said:
My idea was [itex]z^3- z^{-3}= cis(3\theta)- cis(-3\theta)= cos(3\theta)+ sin(3\theta)- (cos(-3\theta)+ sin(-3\theta)[/itex][itex]= cos(3\theta)+ sin(3\theta)- cos(3\theta)+ sin(3\theta)= 2sin(3\theta)[/itex].

This is probably stupid but when I do it that way, I end up with [itex]2isin3θ[/itex] since:
[itex]z^3- z^{-3}= cis(3\theta)- cis(-3\theta)= cos(3\theta)+ isin(3\theta)- (cos(-3\theta)+ isin(-3\theta)[/itex][itex]= cos(3\theta)+ isin(3\theta)- cos(3\theta)+ isin(3\theta)= 2isin(3\theta)[/itex]

My class just recently started our complex number topic and so my knowledge of [itex]cis[/itex] is extremely basic. Should I not be writing [itex]z^3[/itex] as [itex]cos3θ+isin3θ[/itex].

Thanks for your input.
 
Fourthkind said:
This is probably stupid but when I do it that way, I end up with [itex]2isin3θ[/itex] since:
[itex]z^3- z^{-3}= cis(3\theta)- cis(-3\theta)= cos(3\theta)+ isin(3\theta)- (cos(-3\theta)+ isin(-3\theta)[/itex][itex]= cos(3\theta)+ isin(3\theta)- cos(3\theta)+ isin(3\theta)= 2isin(3\theta)[/itex]

The question is asking for the modulus so a factor of i does not change the answer.

Edit: You asked for a geometric reason, so plot any z with the given constraint. z^3 will have the same magnitude (1) and will make an angle 3θ with the real axis if z makes and angle θ. z^-3 will just be the reflection of z^3 about the real axis. The length |z^3-z^-3| is just the length of the line connecting these two points so sin(3θ) will be half of this.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K