A Molar heat capacity of CO2 is too high. Why?

Philip Koeck
Gold Member
Messages
801
Reaction score
229
At very high temperatures CO2 should have Cp = 15/2 R, since there are 3 translational, 2 rotational and 4 vibrational degrees of freedom.
Experimental values are a bit higher than that, at least according to a figure I found on the internet.
Is that correct? And what is the explanation?
A student suggested that when the molecule vibrates in the bending mode it gets an additional rotational degree of freedom, since it is bent most of the time.
Is that a sensible explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Philip Koeck said:
Experimental values are a bit higher than that, at least according to a figure I found on the internet.
Is that correct?
See
https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C124389&Units=SI&Mask=1&Type=JANAFG&Plot=on#JANAFG

At 3000 K, it is pretty much 15/2 R. It goes to higher values at higher temperatures.

Philip Koeck said:
A student suggested that when the molecule vibrates in the bending mode it gets an additional rotational degree of freedom, since it is bent most of the time.
Is that a sensible explanation?
A molecule cannot gain degrees of freedom. A linear triatomic has 2 rotational degrees of freedom, but gains one has an additional vibrational d.o.f. because bending is degenerate. If the molecule is bent, then you would loose a vibrational d.o.f. and gain a rotational one, which would actually reduce Cp, since the vibrational mode contributes 2 quadratic d.o.f. to the 1 rotational d.o.f. (see the Cp values for water).

Treating vibrations has harmonic oscillators is an approximation. The anharmonic character increases as vibrational excitation goes up, hence the approximation ##C_p = (f/2 + 1) R## is less good at higher T.

[Edit: Changed the language a bit to make it more consistent.]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Spinnor, Twigg and Philip Koeck
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top