I Moment of Inertia about an axis and Torque about a point

AI Thread Summary
Angular momentum and torque are defined about a point, while moment of inertia is defined about an axis, creating a need for clarity in their interrelations. The torque generated by a force acting on a body causes rotation, but the choice of axis becomes complex when the body can rotate freely. In such cases, general equations of motion should be applied rather than focusing on a specific axis. When an axis is fixed, only the torque component along that axis is relevant, regardless of the reference point chosen. Understanding the moment of inertia tensor can provide deeper insights into these concepts.
Nikhil_RG
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Angular Momentum and Torque are defined about a point. But Moment of Inertia of a body is defined about an axis. There are equations which connect Angular momentum and Torque with Moment of Inertia. How will this be consistent? When I say that the torque of a force acting on a body about a point causes it to rotate about an axis, which axis should be considered that includes the point about which the torque is acting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nikhil_RG said:
Angular Momentum and Torque are defined about a point. But Moment of Inertia of a body is defined about an axis.
According to whom?

Wikipedia:
Angular momentum is a vector quantity (more precisely, a pseudovector) that represents the product of a body's rotational inertia and rotational velocity (in radians/sec) about a particular axis.

Torque is defined as the product of the magnitude of the force and the perpendicular distance of the line of action of a force from the axis of rotation.
 
Moment of inertia is not defined relative to an axis. It is defined relative to a point. However, it is an order 2 tensor and not a scalar. In order to obtain a scalar, you can restrict the rotation of a body to only be possible around a particular axis. In this case, only the torque’s component in the axis direction will be relevant and angular momentum will be parallel to the axis.
 
Thank you malawi_glenn for the response.

My question comes from the fact that the basic expression to calculate angular momentum involves finding the cross product of the position vector of the particle and it's linear momentum. So there has to be a point about which the position vector is defined and the angular momentum would be calculated about that particular point.
 
Orodruin , is there a textbook or resource that I could refer to to understand about Moment of Inertia Tensor.

And in the case where the body is free to rotate in any axis and a force is acting at some point on it, which causes a Torque, which axis do we consider, since there are no limitations.
 
Nikhil_RG said:
Orodruin , is there a textbook or resource that I could refer to to understand about Moment of Inertia Tensor.
Well, first of all, do you understand tensors?

Nikhil_RG said:
And in the case where the body is free to rotate in any axis and a force is acting at some point on it, which causes a Torque, which axis do we consider, since there are no limitations.
You do not consider an axis. You consider the general equations of motion. There are some simplified cases such as an object rotating freely around a fixed point an object not subject to any net force (just torques).

Nikhil_RG said:
So there has to be a point about which the position vector is defined and the angular momentum would be calculated about that particular point.
In the case where you fix the rotational axis, only the torque in the axis’ direction is relevant. This component will not depend on which reference point you pick as long as you pick a point on the axis.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top