Moment of Inertia of a 4 rod system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the moment of inertia (MOI) for a system of four rods arranged in a square. The calculations provided indicate that the MOI for the x and y axes is correctly derived as (m/4)(8a^2)/12 + 2(m/4)a^2. For the z axis, the MOI is expressed as I_z = I_x + I_y, leading to a simplified form of ma^2 + (ma^2)/3. Participants confirm the correctness of these calculations and suggest further simplification of the results. The focus remains on accurately determining the MOI for this specific rod configuration.
Aurelius120
Messages
269
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
Calculate the Moment of Inertia of each and determine the greatest:
Relevant Equations
MOI=mr2
This was the question
20211125_163051.jpg

20211125_163147.jpg

(The line below is probably some translation of upper line in different language)

For disc it was ma^2/2
For ring it was ma^2
For square lamina it was 2ma^2/3
For rods
It was different
20211125_163250.jpg

Please explain

Thank You🙏
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what was being calculated by this equation
1637853924455.png


The hand-written calculation is a little messy and hard to follow, but it looks correct for the 4 rods making a square.
 
It probably calculated the MOI of the system (because it was the solution given in the booklet)

Also my MOI came out to be
(m/4)×(8a^2)÷12 + 2×(m/4)×a^2
[About x and y axes]

&&

(ma^2)+(ma^2)/3


{About z axis}
 
Aurelius120 said:
Also my MOI came out to be
(m/4)×(8a^2)÷12 + 2×(m/4)×a^2
[About x and y axes]
Ok, you are saying that ##I_{\rm x\, axis} = I_{\rm y\, axis} = \frac{m}{4} \frac{8a^2}{12} + 2 \frac{m}{4}a^2##
That looks correct.
It would be nice to simplify the result.
Aurelius120 said:
&&

(ma^2)+(ma^2)/3


{About z axis}
Here you are using ##I_{\rm z\,axis} = I_{\rm x\,axis}+I_{\rm y\,axis} = 2I_{\rm x\,axis} = ma^2 + \frac{ma^2}{3}##.
This looks correct. Of course you can simplify this result to just one term.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top