Moment of inertia of a rectangular prism

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the formula for the moment of inertia of a rectangular prism at its center of mass. Participants explore various mathematical approaches, integrals, and methods of integration relevant to this topic.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a complex formula involving integrals to derive the moment of inertia but expresses difficulty in solving specific integrals.
  • Another participant suggests referring to a list of moments of inertia for guidance.
  • Multiple participants share their own derivations and methods for calculating the moment of inertia, including the use of density and integration techniques.
  • There is a discussion about the process of integrating with respect to both x and y, with some participants seeking clarification on how variables change during integration.
  • One participant compares the moment of inertia of a rectangular prism to that of a solid disk, noting the differences in their formulas.
  • Several participants express uncertainty about the integration process and seek further explanation on specific steps in the derivation.
  • One participant confirms the correctness of a method after performing the calculations, indicating a level of satisfaction with the results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for deriving the moment of inertia, as multiple approaches and interpretations are presented. There is ongoing uncertainty and clarification sought regarding the integration process.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express limitations in their understanding of calculus, which affects their ability to follow the derivations. There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the integration intervals and variable transformations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals interested in the mathematical derivation of physical concepts, particularly those studying mechanics or engineering principles related to moments of inertia.

benhou
Messages
123
Reaction score
1
I was trying to derive the formula for the moment of inertia of a rectangular prism at its centre of mass. And ended up with this:

\frac{1}{2}M(a/2)^{2}+2\frac{M}{ab}\int^{b/2}_{a/2}arccos(\frac{a^{2}}{2r^{2}}-1)rdr+4\frac{M}{ab}\int^{\sqrt{a^{2}+b^{2}}}_{b/2}(\frac{\pi}{2}-arccos\frac{b/2}{r}-arccos\frac{a/2}{r})rdr

Due to the limitation of my knowledge in Calculus, I was stuck here. Can anyone help me solve these two integral:

\int arccos(\frac{a^{2}}{2r^{2}}-1)rdr

\int (\frac{\pi}{2}-arccos\frac{b/2}{r}-arccos\frac{a/2}{r})rdr
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, the cuboid. Do you know how to do it? My formula doesn't look like it is going to work.
 
benhou said:
Yeah, the cuboid. Do you know how to do it? My formula doesn't look like it is going to work.

I = ∫-y/2+y/2-x/2+x/2ρ r2 dx dy = ∫-y/2+y/2-x/2+x/2ρ[x2+y2] dx dy =2∫ox/2ρyx2dx +2∫oy/2ρxy2dy

Where ρ is the density. So ρ = mass/xy

You can take it from here.

Bob S
 
Last edited:
could you explain how this come about?
 
(1/2)*M((1/2)*a)^2+(1/4)*M*(b^4*arccos((2*a^2-b^2)/b^2)*sqrt(-a^2*(a^2-b^2)/b^4)+2*a^4-2*a^2*b^2)/(sqrt(-a^2*(a^2-b^2)/b^4)*b^2*ab)+4*M*(int(((1/2)*Pi-arccos((1/2)*b/r)-arccos((1/2)*a/r))*r, r = (1/2)*b .. sqrt(a^2+b^2)))/ab
 
benhou said:
could you explain how this come about?

I = ∫-y/2+y/2-x/2+x/2ρ r2 dx dy = ∫-y/2+y/2-x/2+x/2ρ[x2+y2] dx dy =2∫ox/2ρyx2dx +2∫oy/2ρxy2dy

Where ρ is the density. So ρ = mass/xy

I =(2m/xy)[ x·y3/(3·8) + y·x3/(3·8)] =(m/12)(y2 + x2)

If x = y, then I = m·x2/6

Compare this to a solid disk of diameter d: I = md2/8

Bob S
 
Oh, ya. It's just the idea that we have to use both dx and dy, and integrate them one after the other, also that even though x and y are in different intervals we only let the intervals on the intergral sign worry about it. I just can't grasp it.
 
benhou said:
Oh, ya. It's just the idea that we have to use both dx and dy, and integrate them one after the other, also that even though x and y are in different intervals we only let the intervals on the intergral sign worry about it. I just can't grasp it.
Do the integral for a solid disk of diameter d.
Bob S
 
  • #10
ok, i would start like this: \sum r^{2}\Delta m
= \sum r^{2}\rho A
= \sum r^{2}\frac{M}{\pi(d/2)^{2}}2\pi r\Delta r
= 8\frac{M}{d^{2}}\sum r^{3}\Delta r
= 8\frac{M}{d^{2}}\int^{d/2}_{0}r^{3}dr
= 8\frac{M}{d^{2}}\frac{(d/2)^{4}}{4}
= \frac{Md^{2}}{8}

Is this how you want me to do it? Or some other way?
 
  • #11
Looks good. Here is a slightly different way:

Use r = d/2 and m= pi·d2/4

I = ∫o2piorρ·r2 r·dr dθ

I = 2·pi ∫orρ·r2 r·dr

I = 2·pi·ρ·r4/4 = pi·ρ·d4/32 = m·d2/8

Bob S
 
  • #12
Thanks, it works as it came out to be. I guess if I practise it more, the idea will come clearer.
 
  • #13
Bob S said:
-y/2+y/2-x/2+x/2ρ[x2+y2] dx dy =2∫ox/2ρyx2dx +2∫oy/2ρxy2dy

wait, how did the dy become y and dx become x? This was the derivation of the rectangular prism formula.
 
  • #14
benhou said:
wait, how did the dy become y and dx become x?
It's a property of definite integrals.Integrating from -y/2 to 0 gives the same result as integrating from 0 to y/2
 
Last edited:
  • #15
I = ∫-y/2+y/2-x/2+x/2ρ r2 dx dy = ∫-y/2+y/2-x/2+x/2ρ[x2+y2] dx dy
benhou said:
wait, how did the dy become y and dx become x? This was the derivation of the rectangular prism formula.
Let's take just the first term:

I = ∫-y/2+y/2-x/2+x/2ρ·x2 dx dy

Integrating by y first, then by x:

I = ∫-x/2+x/2 ρ·y·x2 dx = 2∫o+x/2 ρ·y·x2 dx = [2ρ·y/3][x/2]3=2ρ·y·x3/24 = ρ·y·x3/12

Now using ρ = m/xy we get

I = m·x2/12 (just the first term; second term is m·y2/12 )

Bob S
 
  • #16
Cool. Thanks Bob!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K