Understanding Moment of Inertia: Solving a Loop-the-Loop Problem"

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the moment of inertia of a solid sphere in a loop-the-loop problem, specifically when rolling on a "V" track. The moment of inertia remains (2/5)*M*r^2, as it is calculated about the sphere's center of mass, despite the sphere contacting the track at a smaller radius. However, the torque applied by the track is affected by this smaller radius, which influences the condition for rolling without slipping. The total kinetic energy of the sphere is the sum of its translational and rotational components. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for solving the loop-the-loop problem accurately.
Frod
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have been given a loop-the-loop problem to do. Now the problem I have isn't with conservation of mechanical or rotational energy, it's with the moment of inertia of the solid sphere. Usually it would be (2/5)*M*r^2 however the sphere is rolling on a "V" track (see image). I get the correct answer if I leave the moment of inertia as (2/5)*M*r^2, however, shouldn't it be different as it is no longer rolling on r, instead it is rolling on r' (see image)?

I have worked out that the angular velocity will be [(2)^0.5*v]/r, where r is the radius of the sphere and v the velocity of the sphere. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Frod.
 

Attachments

  • sphere.gif
    sphere.gif
    836 bytes · Views: 517
Physics news on Phys.org
Frod,

If I understand this problem (and I'm not sure I do) the moment of inertia of inertia of the sphere doesn't change, but the torque on the sphere does, because it's applied at a smaller radius.
 
The fact that the ball makes contact with the track at a smaller distance from the axis of rotation does not change anything. The ball is still rotating about an axis through its center of mass, and the moment of inertia of a ball about any axis through its CM is what you said, (2/5)*M*R^2. In this way, the motion of the ball can be separated neatly into two parts: 1) translation of the center of mass, and 2) rotation about an axis through the CM. The total kinetic energy is the sum of kinetic energies associated with the two motions.

edit: what jdavel says is true, the torque applied by the track is smaller. What this means in terms of calculation is that your condition for rolling without slipping will take into account the smaller radius. So I shouldn't have said that it doesn't change ANYTHING. Your answer for angular velocity looks good.
 
Last edited:
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
893
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
8K