Moments of Inertia Derivation,

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the moment of inertia for specific objects, particularly focusing on two cases from a set of problems. Participants are examining the integration process involved in calculating moments of inertia, referencing relevant equations and their attempts at solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration limits and the relationship between mass and distance from the axis. There are attempts to clarify the integration process and the implications of constants in the equations. Questions arise about how to approach the fourth problem and the variation of radius in relation to mass distribution.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and guidance to each other. Some have made progress in understanding the first problem, while others continue to seek clarification on the fourth problem. There is a collaborative effort to explore different interpretations of the integration process.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is a focus on deriving results without providing complete solutions.

Ush
Messages
97
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have attached the problem in one file and I have attached my attempt in the second file.
I only need help deriving the moment of inertia for the first (1) and fourth (4) objects but I have attached my solutions to the other objects in case it helps jog someones memory onto how to do this =p


Homework Equations



I = ∑miri2

A = area
M = total mass
dm = change in mass
dA = change in area
dr = change in radius

The Attempt at a Solution



attempt is attached

--
Thank you for taking the time to read through my problem and helping me solve it, I appreciate your help
 

Attachments

  • attempt.jpg
    attempt.jpg
    17.5 KB · Views: 477
  • question.jpg
    question.jpg
    16.8 KB · Views: 462
Physics news on Phys.org
Number 1 is exactly the same problem as number 2, just with different limits of integration.

In number 4 note that all the mass is at the same distance from the axis.
 
I'm not sure how to integrate one so that I'll get 1/12ML2

I tried doing something similar

dm/M = dr/0.5 L because dr starts from the pivot point in the center and max dr will only cover half of the total length. After doing the integration I didn't get 1/12ML2

I still don't understand how to begin the fourth one =[
 
Ush said:
I'm not sure how to integrate one so that I'll get 1/12ML2
You've already done the integral (in #2)--the only change is the limits of integration.

I still don't understand how to begin the fourth one =[
I = ∫r2 dm. How does r vary as you move around the shell?
 
another attempt attached
 

Attachments

  • attempt 2.jpg
    attempt 2.jpg
    15.3 KB · Views: 420
Ush said:
another attempt attached
For some reason, you are integrating from 0 to R/2. That's from the center of the rod to one end. But the rod goes from end to end.
 
oh wow =o I can't believe I missed that.
Thanks so much! i understand how to do the first one now =)

could you give me another hint onto how to do the fourth one?
 
Ush said:
could you give me another hint onto how to do the fourth one?
I thought I did:
Doc Al said:
How does r vary as you move around the shell?
I'll rephrase it. What's the distance from the axis of every element of mass dm as you go around the shell?
 
the distance from the axis of every element of mass, dm, is R ?
if R increases, the mass increases because you get a bigger shell

dr/R = dm/M ?? =S
 
  • #10
Ush said:
the distance from the axis of every element of mass, dm, is R ?
Exactly. Is R a variable or a constant? (For a given shell.)
 
  • #11
R is constant for a given shell
 
  • #12
Ush said:
R is constant for a given shell
Right! So simplify and complete the integral: I = ∫R2 dm
 
  • #13
if radius is constant. then mass is constant. there is no dr or dm =S
how do i sub dm for something?
 
  • #14
Ush said:
if radius is constant. then mass is constant.
Not sure what you mean. Hint: How do you deal with constants within the integral sign?
 
  • #15
if you have a constant then you take it out of the integral.
..oh my

I = ∫R2 dm
= R2∫dm
= R2 ∑m
= R2M


THANK YOU SO MUCH!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
52
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K