Moments of Inertia of non-uniform rod

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the moment of inertia of a non-uniform rod with a mass density that increases linearly with distance from a wall. The problem involves calculating the moment of inertia with respect to the center of mass and applying energy conservation principles as the rod is released from a specific angle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the moment of inertia using integration and the relationship between small length elements of the rod. There is uncertainty about substituting differentials in the integral for mass and moment of inertia. Questions arise regarding the correct expression for mass in terms of length and density.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the integration process and the expressions for mass. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of substituting variables in the integral, with some expressing confusion about the direction of their reasoning. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available and the approaches they can take. There is a focus on ensuring clarity in the expressions used for mass and center of mass, as well as the implications of linear density on calculations.

slasakai
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a rod of mass M and length L is supported by a smooth horizontal floor and leans against a smooth vertical wall, the mass density increases linearly with p=kr where r is the distance from the wall and k is a positive constant.
a.finf the moment of inertia of the rod with respect to the centre of mass.
b.the beam is released from a position of rest, at 60 degrees to the downward vertical, find the energy conservation equation of the beam.

Homework Equations



I=∫r^2 dm

The Attempt at a Solution



for part a, I considered a small length of rod, dl, and its mass as dm=(m/l)*dl

and using the fact that density ,p=m/l , m=krl

giving dm=kr dl , here's where I got stuck - I assumed that since dl and dr would be proportional you could simply replace dl with dr in this equation and integrate for mass and moment of inertia etc. doing it this way I got an answer for moment of inertia = (1/2)ML^2 which looks OK. But I am very uncertain about substituting dl for dr.

for part b I'm not completely sure how to even approach this, it would be wonderful if someone could verify my approach and perhaps give me a hint for part b.

thanks in advance,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
slasakai said:

Homework Statement


a rod of mass M and length L is supported by a smooth horizontal floor and leans against a smooth vertical wall, the mass density increases linearly with p=kr where r is the distance from the wall and k is a positive constant.
a. Find the moment of inertia of the rod with respect to the centre of mass.

b. The beam is released from a position of rest, at 60 degrees to the downward vertical. Find the energy conservation equation of the beam.

Homework Equations



I=∫r^2 dm

The Attempt at a Solution



for part a, I considered a small length of rod, dl, and its mass as dm=(m/l)*dl

and using the fact that density ,p=m/l , m=krl

giving dm=kr dl , here's where I got stuck - I assumed that since dl and dr would be proportional you could simply replace dl with dr in this equation and integrate for mass and moment of inertia etc. doing it this way I got an answer for moment of inertia = (1/2)ML^2 which looks OK. But I am very uncertain about substituting dl for dr.

for part b I'm not completely sure how to even approach this, it would be wonderful if someone could verify my approach and perhaps give me a hint for part b.

thanks in advance,
Of course it's fine to use dl for dr.

What is the location of the center of mass ?
 
I worked out that COM is (KL^3/3M) along the rod
 
SammyS said:
Of course it's fine to use dl for dr.

What is the location of the center of mass ?
I worked out that COM is (KL^3/3M) along the rod
 
slasakai said:
I worked out that COM is (KL^3/3M) along the rod
That can be expressed solely in terms of L, without M or k .

What is the mass of the rod, M, in terms of L and k ?
 
the mass M=1/2 * KL^2
 
Last edited:
slasakai said:
the mass M=KLr , from density equation

No. If you replace dr with dl in the integral, then you need to replace r with l for the density in that integral.
 
SammyS said:
No. If you replace dr with dl in the integral, then you need to replace r with l for the density in that integral.


sorry, I was reading that of my old piece of working, I have the correct answer up now :)
 
SammyS said:
No. If you replace dr with dl in the integral, then you need to replace r with l for the density in that integral.

BUT to be honest with you I'm getting myself more and more confused with this question, I''m not really sure where I'm going anymore with it. I Do you know the correct answer?
 
  • #10
slasakai said:
the mass M=1/2 * KL^2
slasakai said:
Sorry, I was reading that of my old piece of working. I have the correct answer up now :)
It's easier for people to follow a thread at a later date if you don't use the "Edit" feature to change a post after it's been responded to. (Some typo's may be edited after the fact to make things clear.)

You previously had M=KLr .



Now substitute the expression, 1/2 * KL^2, for M into your expression for the location of the center (centre) of mass.
 
  • #11
SammyS said:
It's easier for people to follow a thread at a later date if you don't use the "Edit" feature to change a post after it's been responded to. (Some typo's may be edited after the fact to make things clear.)

You previously had M=KLr .



Now substitute the expression, 1/2 * KL^2, for M into your expression for the location of the center (centre) of mass.
Oh sorry I didn't realize.
yep, did that and managed to get L/3 for COM, and managed the rest of the question! Thanks for your help
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K