Momentum - Impulse collision to find initial speeds and directions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to momentum and impulse in the context of a collision between two particles. Participants are examining the implications of directionality and sign conventions in their calculations, as well as the interpretation of given information regarding initial speeds and directions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the correctness of their diagrams and the direction of impulses. There is a discussion about which particle is moving faster after the collision and how to interpret the signs of impulse in their equations. Some participants are reflecting on the sign conventions used in the official answer and suggesting alternative approaches.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions about the problem setup. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of sign conventions and the interpretation of momentum versus velocity, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem lacks clarity regarding the direction of impulses and initial conditions, which has led to confusion in their interpretations and calculations.

dahoom102
Messages
12
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Two particles P and Q of masses 3 kg and 2 kg respectively are moving along the same straight line on a smooth horizontal surface. The particles collide. After the collision both the particles are moving in the same direction, the speed of P is 1 m/s and the speed of Q is 1.5 m/s. The magnitude of the impulse of P on Q is 9N s. Find:
a) Speed and direction of P before the collision
b) Speed and direction of Q before the collision
Relevant Equations
I=m(v-u)
Pf=Pi
Hi
I've tried solving this question but it seems that I flipped the direction of the impulse, what did I interpret wrong? the question didn't give any clue on their direction before so I couldn't infer the direction of the impulse. It also just gave me the magnitude without the direction. I would appreciate if you could help me know why is my diagram wrong.
Screenshots.jpeg

Screenshot_32.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
dahoom102 said:
why is my diagram wrong.
If after two particles collide they are moving in the same direction, which is moving faster, the one in the lead or the one behind?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dahoom102
haruspex said:
If after two particles collide they are moving in the same direction, which is moving faster, the one in the lead or the one behind?
Oh, i just realized! how couldn't I be logical in the first place ;(. Thanks a ton haruspex!
 
Your equations would yield the same results as those of book (with the roles of u,v swapped) , if you change the sign of impulse in each one, that is if you had the equations $$-9=3(1-v)$$$$9=2(1.5-u)$$.

However I am confused too why we should consider the impulse as negative in the first equation with v , and as positive in the second equation with u.
 
Can I add a few words as I can see some sources of confusion.

In the official answer (shown in Post #1), it looks like the author has mixed sign conventions:
- for P, they have taken the positive direction to be same as the direction of the impulse acting on P (to the left);
- for Q, they have taken the positive direction to be same as the direction of the impulse acting on Q (to the right).

Very silly and/or a bit of a bodge (IMO)!

(Also note, in the official answer, ‘u’ is P’s initial velocity and ‘v’ is Q’s initial velocity. That seems logical - based on alphabetical ordering.)

A more sensible approach to the sign convention would be to use the known common direction of the final velocities as the reference. Take it to be the +x direction (to the right).

The final velocities of P and Q are then both positive (+1m/s and +1.5m/s).

It is not hard to deduce that the impulse of Q on P must have been negative (-9Ns) and the impulse of P on Q must have been positive (+9Ns).

We then get:
For P: -9 = 3(1-u) ⇒ u = 4m/s
For Q: +9 = 2(1.5 – v) ⇒ v = -3m/s
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
@Steve4Physics, are you suggesting the author wasn't minding their P's and Q's?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics and haruspex
Following the book's bad example and ignoring units, I would say.

Q has momentum ##+3## after the collision and was given an impulse of ##+9## so must have had a momentum of ##-6## before the collision.

P has momentum ##3## after an impulse of ##-9## so must have had ##12##.

It seems logical to me use momentum rather than velocity. And then get the velocity from the momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob012345 and Steve4Physics

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K