Undergrad Momentum of a Water Jet Impacting Plate

Click For Summary
In the scenario of a fluid jet impacting a stationary plate, momentum is not conserved due to the influence of external forces. The vertical force from gravity and the plate alters the fluid's momentum during the impact. After the impact, the total momentum of the fluid is zero in the reference frame of the plate, as the radial velocities cancel out symmetrically. The reasoning highlights that momentum conservation depends on the absence of external forces acting on the system. Thus, the fluid's momentum changes due to these external influences throughout the event.
person123
Messages
326
Reaction score
52
TL;DR
When a jet impacts a plate, is the momentum of the fluid conserved?
Suppose you have a jet of fluid (say water) traveling vertically upward at a constant velocity. It impacts a stationary horizontal plate and so moves radially outward in all directions. Assume that there's no energy loss during the impact, so the speed of the fluid remains constant. Is momentum of the fluid conserved, and what is the total momentum of the fluid after impact?

I believe the momentum is not conserved, since the fluid changes directions. The vertical downward force of the plate leads to a net change in momentum of the fluid. This is even in an ideal scenario without energy loss. I also believe the total momentum of the fluid after the impact is 0 (in the reference frame of the stationary plate). The total radial velocity would add up to 0 since it's symmetric. Alternatively, since there's no horizontal force, the horizontal momentum must remain 0, and the vertical momentum must be 0 as well since there's no vertical motion of the fluid after impact. Is my reasoning correct?

(For context for why I'm asking, I'm TAing a lab where this question was asked, and every group answered momentum is conserved or it's not conserved just because of frictional loss, so I want to make sure my reasoning is correct).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the fluid alone is the system, its momentum is not conserved because external forces are acting on it throughout the event you describe:
  1. As soon as the fluid emerges from the nozzle and until it hits the plate, the external force of gravity acts on it and, therefore, its momentum is not conserved.
  2. During the fluid's collision with the plate, the external force of the plate acts on it and, therefore, its momentum is not conserved.
There is only one criterion for determining whether momentum is conserved: whether an external force acts on the system or not. It follows that when two balls collide, the momentum of either ball is not conserved, but the momentum of the two-ball system is.
 
  • Like
Likes person123 and berkeman
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K