I Momentum of a Water Jet Impacting Plate

AI Thread Summary
In the scenario of a fluid jet impacting a stationary plate, momentum is not conserved due to the influence of external forces. The vertical force from gravity and the plate alters the fluid's momentum during the impact. After the impact, the total momentum of the fluid is zero in the reference frame of the plate, as the radial velocities cancel out symmetrically. The reasoning highlights that momentum conservation depends on the absence of external forces acting on the system. Thus, the fluid's momentum changes due to these external influences throughout the event.
person123
Messages
326
Reaction score
52
TL;DR Summary
When a jet impacts a plate, is the momentum of the fluid conserved?
Suppose you have a jet of fluid (say water) traveling vertically upward at a constant velocity. It impacts a stationary horizontal plate and so moves radially outward in all directions. Assume that there's no energy loss during the impact, so the speed of the fluid remains constant. Is momentum of the fluid conserved, and what is the total momentum of the fluid after impact?

I believe the momentum is not conserved, since the fluid changes directions. The vertical downward force of the plate leads to a net change in momentum of the fluid. This is even in an ideal scenario without energy loss. I also believe the total momentum of the fluid after the impact is 0 (in the reference frame of the stationary plate). The total radial velocity would add up to 0 since it's symmetric. Alternatively, since there's no horizontal force, the horizontal momentum must remain 0, and the vertical momentum must be 0 as well since there's no vertical motion of the fluid after impact. Is my reasoning correct?

(For context for why I'm asking, I'm TAing a lab where this question was asked, and every group answered momentum is conserved or it's not conserved just because of frictional loss, so I want to make sure my reasoning is correct).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the fluid alone is the system, its momentum is not conserved because external forces are acting on it throughout the event you describe:
  1. As soon as the fluid emerges from the nozzle and until it hits the plate, the external force of gravity acts on it and, therefore, its momentum is not conserved.
  2. During the fluid's collision with the plate, the external force of the plate acts on it and, therefore, its momentum is not conserved.
There is only one criterion for determining whether momentum is conserved: whether an external force acts on the system or not. It follows that when two balls collide, the momentum of either ball is not conserved, but the momentum of the two-ball system is.
 
  • Like
Likes person123 and berkeman
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top