How Do You Apply the Del Operator to a Momentum-Dependent Wave Function?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying the del operator to the wave function represented as ∇exp(ip⋅r/ħ). Participants emphasize the importance of expanding the dot product of momentum and position in Cartesian coordinates rather than assuming a specific direction, such as the z-axis. The correct formulation involves expressing momentum and position in terms of their Cartesian components, leading to a more general application of the del operator. The gradient of the wave function is derived using partial derivatives with respect to each spatial variable, which can simplify calculations when functions depend on a single variable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the del operator (∇) and its applications
  • Knowledge of Cartesian coordinates and vector notation
  • Basic principles of partial differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the del operator in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about vector calculus in Cartesian coordinates
  • Explore the implications of momentum and position in wave functions
  • Investigate simplifications in derivatives for functions of single variables
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with wave functions, and anyone interested in advanced vector calculus applications in physics.

apenn121
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I've been given the question "What is ∇exp(ipr/ħ) ?"

I recognise that this is the del operator acting on a wave function but using the dot product of momentum and position in the wave function is new to me. The dot product is always scalar so I was wondering if it would be correct in writing that it is equal to prcosθ and then using the spherical coordinate del operator on the wave function to find the result. £
 
Physics news on Phys.org
apenn121 said:
so I was wondering if it would be correct in writing that it is equal to prcosθ
If you do that, you will be assuming the momentum is directed toward z axis, the result will not be so general then. Just expand the dot product in terms of Cartesian components.
For your future post in this section, please refer to our Guidelines which can be found at the top of the thread list.
 
In Cartesian coordinates, you will often see something like:
##\vec p = \hat x p_x+ \hat y p_y+\hat z p_z## and ##\vec r = \hat x f_x(x,y,z)+ \hat y f_y(x,y,z)+\hat z f_z(x,y,z)##
Then ## i\vec p \cdot \vec r = i (p_x f_x(x,y,z)+p_y f_y(x,y,z ) + p_z f_z(x,y,z)) ##
So you gradient would be
## \nabla W = \hat x (i \frac{\partial}{\partial x} (p_x f_x(x,y,z)+p_y f_y(x,y,z ) + p_z f_z(x,y,z)))W + \hat y (i \frac{\partial}{\partial y} (p_x f_x(x,y,z)+p_y f_y(x,y,z ) + p_z f_z(x,y,z)))W + \hat z (i \frac{\partial}{\partial z} (p_x f_x(x,y,z)+p_y f_y(x,y,z ) + p_z f_z(x,y,z)))W ##
In many cases, the functions of position might only depend on one of the spatial variables which can simplify the derivatives.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K