Momentum or Kinetic Energy to find Acceleration?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the calculation of acceleration for a craft using charged particles (protons) accelerated by an electric field, comparing methods based on momentum and kinetic energy. Participants note that while both calculations are similar, they yield significantly different results, with kinetic energy calculations producing values much larger than those derived from momentum. The conversation highlights the importance of considering relativistic effects and the rate of change of momentum when calculating thrust and acceleration. There is an emphasis on the conservation of momentum versus kinetic energy, with the latter not being conserved in certain scenarios, leading to discrepancies in results. Ultimately, the discussion reveals complexities in accurately determining acceleration due to varying interpretations of energy and momentum in high-speed contexts.
  • #31
I also used the relativistic equations and they give the same non compliance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
God Plays Dice said:
Yes. I take the sum of all the particles in terms of momentum, ie their mass X vel and then divide thru by mass of the craft. I'm sure this is correct. Then I take the sum of all the particles 0.5 mass X vel^2. And rearrange this equation to find vel of the craft plugging in mass of craft. When the vel of the particles is very high then the KE vel is much higher than the momentum vel. When the vel of the particles is quite slow I get a KE vel slower than momentum vel. Do the excel sheet yourself it takes only a couple of minutes just plug any mass values in and do a range of particle velocities youl get non compliant KE vel with p vel.
There si no point to repeat. The second method is not valid.
There is no momentum velocity and KE velocity.
 
  • #33
But how can something have a velocity that's described by its momentum, and at the same time not have the required KE for the job?
 
  • #34
Can the craft pick up more KE than is supplied to the particles?
 
  • #35
God Plays Dice said:
But how can something have a velocity that's described by its momentum, and at the same time not have the required KE for the job?

Not all Energy goes into the motion of the objects. Consider an inelastic collision. Momentum is conserved but KE is not.
 
  • #36
In the nonrelativistic limit
KE =E say = (p^2)/(2m) We have
dE/dt = [{2p(dp/dt)}/2m
So Force = [(dp/dt)/m] = (1/p)*(dE/dt)
So no square roots please!
 
  • #37
God Plays Dice said:
Hi all,

I have charged particles (protons) accelerated by an electric field. If I add up all the momentum and find the change in momentum per sec I can find the acceleration of my craft by
dp/dt /M = a

If I add up all the kinetic energy of the particles and find the KE per sec, I can find the acceleration by
Sqrt (KE/t /0.5*M) = a

They are both similar calcs but give wildly different values. KE calc is 10^9 bigger.

So which is it? KE or p to find acceleration?
at that magnitude dp/dt =mdv/dt + vdm/dt i.e ma + vdm/dt.
here m = Mo/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2),
Mo is rest mass of the particle.
Please try this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K