I have been banned, maybe my nickname was not so kind. I let the topic continue here. I report my last comment:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

"Ok, I got the point. thanks for replying!

It's just a change of basis that under boundary condition diagonalize the Hamiltonian. But then a subtle point:

In order for k-representation to be a good basis change (i.e. orthogonality and completeness properties) I guess that one has to choose the k values AS if there were periodic boundary conditions (i.e. k=2pi*n/L). Right?

Then another last point:

how do you really model a finite size chain? A finite size chain has zero boundary condition. In this case I use the k representation with k chosen as if there were periodic boundary condition and just then reconstruct the physical wavefunction by making a wavepacket that is zero on the borders?

"

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Momentum space representation for finite lattices - continued

Loading...

Similar Threads - Momentum space representation | Date |
---|---|

A High-energy tail of H electron momentum distribution? 1/p^6? | Jul 1, 2017 |

Thickness of 'shell' in momentum space in a plasma? | Jan 2, 2016 |

Explaining Band theory and Momentum Space to laymen? | Mar 22, 2015 |

Density matrix in Momentum Space | Apr 14, 2013 |

Momentum space representation for finite lattices | Mar 19, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**